In the last year's accounts, the director loaned the company around £9000 which was put in the Creditors amounts due within 12 months part of the end of year accounts.
The next full year saw no change to this amount. So I again put it in the creds within 12 months bit.
However, the profit and loss account doesn't include this figure at all meaning I can't get the balance sheet to balance (if I leave it out altogether, it looks like the shareholders funds are too high (although still negative!) I can't see anyway to include it at all but at the end of this year the funds available should be the current years -2000 + the DLA carried forward of -9000 giving -11000.
Think that I'm having a senior moment as I don't understand the problem.
Last year the directors injection of cash increased bank by 9000 and the capital account will have also increased by 9000 representing the directors loan. Surely everything balances on the balance sheet?
If we're saying that this was an actual interest bearing loan by the director then creditors and bank would have been hit but it would still have balanced.
I don't see that this figure should have ever gone anywhere near the P&L? As I say though, it's a Sunday afternoon and I'm probably reading it incorrectly.
Cheers,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
The balance sheet for the current year (as per companies house abbreviated accounts) balances fine if I don't include the DLA amount in the creditors amounts.
However, I can see that the company has not repaid the director so I felt that this amount should be included somewhere (I've currently added a note to the co.house submission form - Transactions with Directors - to this effect)
To answer Shamus: There is no mention of the DLA amount in the P/L and there was no interest on the loan - the director simply used personal funds to keep his business afloat.
Quite obviously, I'm not an accountant nor even a bookkeeper by profession, although I've run my own company for over 10 years and prepared/submitted self-assessments for others. I know I'm missing something really basic here. I think I'll submit as is (since it balances) and spend some time reading up to prepare for the next round of accounts!
But there have been no new transactions with directors beyond the one applied last year.
To add the £9k again would double the amount in the directors loan account so you would indeed be out by 9k.
It seems to me that you are missing the fact that the money is already included in the figures that you have and in trying to include it again you are going 9k out of balance as there is no physical change in funds so no addition to bank for this year.
Short answer is that from what you say the carried forward capital account already includes the loan as does the existing bank.
Think of it in conceptual terms. All that a directors loan account is is an increase of the amount of capital that the director has invested in the company. He has not increased his investment this year so the capital remains the same with no movement to be reported.
Hope that this helps rather than confuses matter further,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
It's never a waste of time, just hope we can help.
Trying to fathom what you have got going on.
Are you adding the DLA in again or carrying it down from the previous year?
If there is a closing balance on the account, which there will be if the directors have not been repaid, then the balance should be carried down and already included in the current liabilities section of the Balance Sheet but if you are entering the amount again you will add on another £9K.
it's normally me trying to beat Phillip from the back office group.
Glad to get confirmation that both of us have come to the same conclusion on this one which is basically that Junie is attempting to add the directors loan again so doubling it up.
Talk soon,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Referring to the co. house abbrev accounts, would a loan to the company be classed in with the turnover for that year, or is the turnover just the total sales?
it's not a loan that your talking about, it's an increase in the directors capital invested in the company.
Directors capital is nothing to do with turnover which as you state turnover is just total sales.
Had this been an actual loan it would still have been reflected only in the balance sheet, not in the P&L.
cheers,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Reading between the lines here, are you saying that you included the injection of capital last year as turnover? If that's the case last years accounts are incorrect.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
in 07/08 year (the first year I did these accounts - up till then an accountant did them) I had a figure of approx 9000 in the creditors list for the director's loan account. Again, it was abbrev accts, and the amount did not appear anywhere else in the return. This balanced (as in the automatic checker on co house site) so I assumed all was ok.
this year (08/09 accts) I did the P/L as before which showed a loss of around 2000
sales were around 5000 and cost of sales+admin were 7000 = loss of 2000
for this year there was also an extra (private, not DL) loan to the company of 3044 which I have put in the creditors list although it does not show anywhere as an "income". I can't see anywhere on the co.hs template to add this.
Plugging these figures into the template balances if I don't include the DLA in the creds list If I include the DLA as creds due, then I don't balance.
I need to keep the DLA showing in the system so the director can correctly be repaid when the company is in a position to do so (probably this year)
Both years showed a loss so no tax was due anyway so it does not impact on hmrc payments.
If I made a mistake last year, I'd rather not draw attention to it lest we invite an inspection - nothing untoward going on, just don't need the stress of it.
Maybe things would be clearer if I used the "full accounts" instead of abbreviated.
Unfortunately, I'm running out of time to get this in - I also have my own & my daughters self-assess to do by next Sunday (as well as working full-time, of course) nothing like leaving things till the last minute!
As you say, time to go to the full accounts. Difficult to do without having access to the books to see where the issues arising but, here goes :
The 9k on take up sounds ok. (Its capital and shouldn't go anywhere near P&L)
2k loss sounds good. (5k - 7k).
New loan recorded in creditors, doesn't go anywhere near income. That's fine.
Variance on balance is the 9k meaning that the owners capital must be included twice.
Right, the rocks that you need to look under for this are :
1) Does the 9k appear under creditors (amounts falling due within one year). In the notes to the accounts you will find this broken down by something like tax, directors current account and accrued expenses.... You've already stated that it is here so lets take this as red.
2) Does the 9k appear in the profit & loss figure shown under reserves. This will include the amount as at the start of the year plus the negative profit for the year (As mentioned, you'll find that under reserves).
I suspect that the 9k appears in both even though it should only appear in the creditors and the reserves figure should have included only the brought forwards P&L figure. You won't see an exact 9k as the brought forward P&L figure will also include the legitimate profit for the previous year.
If as I suspect the figure is also in the brought forwards P&L figure you need to look at how it got into there and remedy removing it. Compare this brought forwards figure to the reported profit in the previous years accounts. They're supposed to be the same figure (unless there have been material post balance sheet events that affect the financial position as it should have been at year end).
If the 9k is only in one of the fields then let me through and we'll try and work through other alternatives.
Looking at the numbers that you're talking about it really shouldn't be too difficult to find a rogue 9k.
cheers,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
thanks for that Shaun, I'll have a look through my figures for this & last year. I'll let you know tomorrow night (need to stop for now - my poor old brain is hurting)
You've been very helpful (& Bill) thanks for your time