The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Unfair Request?


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Unfair Request?
Permalink Closed


Hi all, we recently had a VAT inspection covering the past 3 years.

The inspector was with us for a couple of hours and upon leaving (around lunchtime - not because we were closing) asked us to scan every invoice from the past 3 years (well over 1000) and email them to her to check at her convenience.

Is this a fair request? It's a lot of work to scan all those invoices when they are readily available for her here.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 882
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi

In my opinion, if she wants this information, she should either stay at your premises for the duration or take your records away (with your permission and an uplift record) to copy at her convenience, and then return.

It is not your responsibility to copy/scan documents for them. If you make them readily available for inspection, they then have the chance to inspect them. I have been on many inspections that have lasted all day or more.

I would suggest to her that it is not practical to scan the invoices and invite her back to conclude what she started.

P



__________________


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have always found the VAT people to be very professional in their approach.

Were your records in a good state? Had glaring errors been found even during the short visit?

I think that the quote is that an officer of Revenue & Customs has the power to demand the production of documents at the principal place of business and at such time as the authorised person may reasonably require.

Although this seems a very unusual approach there may be good reason for it such as a large number of unusual transactions requiring further investigation.

You may wish to contact your VAT office and enquire as to why copies are required in this form. Certainly whenever I have dealt with cases of this nature they have wanted the original documents not copies. Or to have taken a copy themselves of the original.

However, as the inspector can within reason demand pretty much anything that they require then you may have to comply.

Talk to the VAT office but as I say be prepared not to get the answer that you want.

Please keep us informed as to what happens with this one.

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Phillip,

long time no chat.

where you been matey?

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 882
Date:
Permalink Closed

Work has been pretty tough lately, still (but off for Easter) in Brum for a few more weeks and also trying to keep the day job going, as turnover is not good and the company is struggling to say the least!

Have been trying to keep up on here but time just does not allow, but today back in the office so have less pressure!!

P

__________________


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Permalink Closed

The invoices were presented in one ring bound folder per annual year, arranged by month (approx 30 - 40 documents per month).

There was a couple of items she queried but nothing unusual.

If she wanted to find a particular document, it would not have been difficult

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1963
Date:
Permalink Closed

This is an excerpt from the inspectors own handbook, look at the 'reasonaly required' at the bottom

CH21620 Information & Inspection Powers: Conditions and safeguards: What we can require or inspect: Reasonably required


Information or an inspection can only be reasonably required where it could affect a persons tax position. If having the information or carrying out the inspection could not affect a persons tax position now or in the future it is not reasonable to require it.

Sometimes it is not possible to know for sure that the information gathered will affect a persons tax position until you get the information or carry out the inspection.

You may face claims that the information you seek does not affect a persons tax position. Such claims may be merited, and you should consider them carefully. But the key test is whether the information is reasonably required for the purpose of checking the tax position, not whether as a matter of fact it turns out to affect the tax position.

However, you must be able to show why seeking the information or carrying out the inspection may help you to



decide what the correct tax position is, or
decide how the persons tax position can be corrected, if appropriate, or
ensure that the correct amount of tax is paid or overpaid tax is repaid.
You can only correct a tax position if you can make an assessment, an amendment or a repayment within the time limits set for making them. You should ensure that you use the appropriate time limits for the particular circumstances.

Reasonably required means getting the balance right between



the burden put on someone to provide the information or face an inspection, and
how important the information or inspection is in deciding on the correct tax position.
As well as the Human Rights Act considerations, see CH21300, you should consider when to ask for information, see CH21640.



__________________
Rob
www.accounts-solutions.com


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

I agree that 1000 invoices seems more than a bit unreasonable. Have a chat with someone in her office as to the best way forwards with this.

As Phillip suggests, see if you can arrange for the job to be finished on site.

whatever you do though, be very very reasonable with them even if they're not being. Upsetting the VAT people is like poking a sleeping tiger with a stick.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 70
Date:
Permalink Closed

Poking a sleeping tiger with a stick ... brilliant!!

Peter

PJC Bookkeeping Services

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink Closed

Although a slightly different case, one of my clients had a investigation (not VAT) on R&R and HMRC wanted physical copies of all R&R invoices for a specific year. Took me ages to pick them all out and photocopy them but we did, even small Wickes receipts and local DIY ones for under £1!!!!! After receipt of these documents and inspector accepted the accounts with no penalties incurred.

__________________

Advice from beyond the grave!!!

E&OE

lor


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 941
Date:
Permalink Closed

Shamus wrote:

I agree that 1000 invoices seems more than a bit unreasonable. Have a chat with someone in her office as to the best way forwards with this.

As Phillip suggests, see if you can arrange for the job to be finished on site.

whatever you do though, be very very reasonable with them even if they're not being. Upsetting the VAT people is like poking a sleeping tiger with a stick.



is that rodney and delboy! lol

 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About