I would like to have a career as an accountant and am willing to work my way up but which way to go? There are so many choices my head is spinning. I thought the IAB was the way to start but then found out about ICB and AAT, could anyone advise which could be the best way of going.
I think most on here would suggest AAT as a very good option but IAB would probably be the quicker option for getting a practising license and maybe ACCA could be studied at the same time. Shaun is our resident expert on this path and I am sure he will let you know of the advantages and thepitfalls (Of which there are some) of going that route if you are looking to be self employed.
I concur with Rob and Steve, AAT is the route to go... Or CAT (sorry to throw another one in.
What you really need to decide is where you want to be. You mention accountancy rather than bookkeeping and you also mention confusion over the various bodies.
I'll give you a quick rundown as to whats available.
ICB and IAB are really aimed at people who want to become self employed bookkeepers. There is no requirement to work for anyone else and with either route you can self train. Recently the ICB have been becoming a bit arrogant much to the benefit of the IAB.
AAT is a qualification widely recognised by employers across the world. A fully qualified MAAT is an accountant. AAT is run by most of the main accountancy bodies except for the ACCA who have their own qualification for this mid level called CAT.
There is also a tax organisation at this level called ATT (not to be confused with AAT). In itself another very good qualification but often taken in conjunction with another qualification. (I think that Robs our only ATT person on here but I could be wrong).
The next higher level is ACCA and CIMA. The former concentrates on financial accountancy whilst the latter concentrates on management accountancy. However, whichever you studied there is considerable overlap in the syllabuses.
ACCA is the more demanding of the two and also the more draconian in what it allows it's students to do.
At the higher level there is ACA (again, not to be confused with ACCA). ACA's are chartered accountants and would be members of either the ICAEW or ICAS.
Again at the higher level there is also CTA which again is a tax body. At that level it's difficult to even be accepted to study with them though let alone pass the exams.
Let us know what your plan is (employed / self employed / bookkeeper / accountant?).
From the sound of things already though I think that AAT is where you should be looking at starting and when you get to MAAT decide on whether you want to be an accountant at that level or go on the further studies with the higher bodies.
Good luck with whatever path that you take and welcome to the forum,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Thank you for your replies, wow it has given me so much to think about. My plan was to be an employed accountant and work my way up to as high as i can. I will consider all you have told me but i like the idea of starting with the AAT.
I think it's important to point out that the ACCA and CIMA are professional qualifications, traditionally" obtained after a first degree.
In the traditional way, an Econs & Acc student will graduate and join, say PWC. There, he/she will pursue one of the many professional qualifications (usually sponsored by the employer).
AAT is al alternative way to get into the Big 4 firms. Also, if you fancy a degree, do all three AAT levels, write a dissertation/thesis and you can get a degree from the AAT affiliated uni (forgot which one).
I don't believe what you said there is completely correct.
The fact that many people who take the ACCA route already have a degree does not necessitate a degree in order to take that route. In fact, the foundation level is the equivalent is BSc level and by putting in a project to Oxford Brookes after passing foundation you are in fact awarded a BSc.
The professional level papers I am reliably informed are about the level required of MSc students.
I think that the two facts are really divorced from each other. Most people need a degree to get a job, if you get a job in accountancy then they enrole you on ACCA.
If you joined a practice or ine of the big four or a bank without a degree you would still be put on the ACCA route. It's just a fact that very very few people without degree's ever get that opportunity.
Personally I was offered a position with the one of the big five that doesn't exist anymore but refused it.
I have self funded my ACCA studies and I don't have a degree.
I will however concede that AAT is an easier route to accountant status but working in banking it's not a qualification that would win you any brownie points as they're only interested in ACCA and ACA (A degree doesn't even get asked about if you have ACCA or ACA status).
All the best,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
I used the word "traditionally" in there. The reason being is because I came across some posts where people thought that one had to do AAT, then ACCA, etc., then start working, i.e. 6/7 years of studying before working - which is not the case. Sorry if it wasn't clear.
Yes! That the one - Oxford Brookes! Thanks. What I meant by the "traditional route of a degree"? Doing and Economics & Accounting degree, for example, will expose one to other facets - not just accounting. Plus, you will already get a number of exemptions.
I think the AAT provides a great introduction to accounting - especially for people (newbies) like me. It gives the necessary skills up to a certain level. Sometimes, you do not need ACCA skills, but a decent accounting exposure (along with other aspects) before embarking on, say, an MBA course.
This is a very useful site! Thanks.
P.S.I don't think this is wrong (especially as I'm getting these info from my cousin).
When are you off next to Thailand? You mentioned the north? Do you spend most of your time in Chiang Mai/Rai?
I spent many a year there - mostly in BKK. Most of the operators were there anyway, e.g. TT&T, TA, AIS, etc. Enjoyed TT&T the most. The have a training centre near Ayutthaya, which is serene. Enjoyed conducting training there - peaceful.
No plans for a trip out there at the moment not least because the Baht is so strong against the pound.
When there it's actually the North East. My village is Kut Nam Si which is about 3km from the town of Nam Pong which is 30km North of the city of Khon Kaen. which I'm sure that you must have heard mentioned.
I keep finding myself zooming in on the place using Google earth. Unfortunately it only gets in close enough to recognise the various house tops and many of the area's have not been updated since 2002 so the house that I was going to buy has been in construction for eight years.... Actually, knowing Khonkaen that might actually be true!
I'm never really happy spending too much time in Bangkok due to the pollution problem. When it used to be the old Don Mueang International airport (which I prefer) it used to be so easy to fly in from Heathrow, walk across the footbridge to domestic and then straight out on a shuttle flight to KK.
On the AAT / ACCA subject I see your point about people assuming AAT then ACCA. I think that the reality is that most people should do AAT and then perhaps ATT, not ACCA as for starters signing up severely restricts what you are allowed to do even though you've passed AAT exams that say that your allowed to prepare accounts. And also because most people just don't really need it.
Personally I did the Open University Certificate in accounting as an introduction but signed up for the ACCA at the same time and took the ACCA exams at the same time as the equivalent open university ones.
I think that the two really complimented each other helping me to get exceptional scores with the OU and understanding the basics for my studies with the ACCA.
I chose the ACCA route as it means something in banking whereas AAT doesn't. If I were approaching this just from the perspective of accountancy then I would have taken the AAT / ATT route as it's the optimal route to being equiped to do the job.
I can see now what you were saying so I think that it's just one of those threads where we're both right but somewhere between our heads and our fingers things didn't quite translate as we expected them to read.
Anyway, hope that you're having a good one.
Talk later,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Indeed! from Don Mueang, it's easy to get to Ratchadaphisek (some of the operators are headquartered there). I've not made use of the new airport - haven't been there since April 2004. Never had the chance to go up north much, as I handled the central bit. I like Kanchanaburi and Pitsanulok.
Yes, BKK can be a mare, but we try to avoid the touristy bits like Sukhomvit, etc. My office was just off the Pleonchit BTS stop (next to the Conrad Hotel). Weekends meant getting away from BKK and Rayong was one of our favourite getaways - not too far away but far enough away from BKK :D
Now, after may years in the telecoms industry, am looking for a new career, a new challenge. Just something different. Having explored all options, MBA seems to be the way to go. But need some prep courses to get me up to the required level.
Another thing about the telecoms/IT industry. There are loads of contractors/consultants. You can find them with operators like Vodafone in Newbury, O2 in Slough, etc. Or with vendors along the M3/4 corridors. There's also Orange in Bristol.
These contractors have 2 choices - using an umbrella company like Parasol or going the limited company route. In the latter case, I think you guys and gals can be useful to these contractors.
you know the bit around BKK an awful lot better than me. As I say, mostly I just went straight to domestic and out to KK (which I absolutely love).
Only been to the new airport once back in 2008 and not awfully impressed. Seems very large and empty but still not so large that the taxi touts can't find you in a heart beat. Have you noticed that they pick of the untanned tourists like a pride of lions picking off straggling wildebeest!
My career to date has concentrated on business analysis, data analysis and project management mostly in the banking sector specifically back office operations so I know the contractor model very well.
I dated an ACA for a while and realised how similar the job that I was already doing was to accountancy so decided to formalise it a bit and get the ACCA letters after my name which both opens new doors and helps with careers in banking.
The qualifications taught me a lot, and whilst for a career in accountancy AAT would have been a better option. For my purposes where it has to be both recognised in banking and of use in an accountancy and bookkeeping context I think that it was actually the perfect choice even with the restriction on what I am allowed to do as far as accounts prep goes.
The really good thing about contractors of course is that the books are simple and they have absolutely no idea how much accountancy fee's should be... Much as I found out when I realised that paying £1200 plus VAT per year to slap your info into IRIS was a bit on the steep side especially as I was already doing all of the basics (trial balance / VAT / Payroll / companies house returns / my own self assessment / etc. etc.).
I now pay £350 plus VAT per year. I do all the work myself and the accountant sticks it in IRIS. I know that it takes them next to no time to do but that softwares not cheap so I don't begrudge the the fee's.
Personally I wouldn't go down the umbrella company route as (1) I have every belief that my company will become something more substantial and (2) I'm just too much of a control freak to give anyone else the reigns of my financial affairs.
Oh, while I think about it, you missed Cable and Wireless in Milton Keynes. I worked on the voice transition project for them for a few months.
Right, lets see what everyone else has written whilst I've been writing this.
Talk later,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
C&W have their main offices in Bracknell. It's mostly between that "triangle" formed by the M4 (I'd say from Reading but can be Newbury to include VF), M3 (from Basingstoke) and London.
One of the telco players have approached me to join them on a contract basis. I have been meaning to try this and it's a good time now, seeing that I will be leaving my current job.