the problem with Ratio's is that there are often several different definitions in common use and all of them are correct in the context for which they are being used.
In the case of expenses it's a case of what do you want the expense to be a percentage of?
Generally for the given expense or collection of expenses they are interested in expenses as a percentage of sales which is what I would generally class as the expenses ratio.
So, for example, the expenses ratio could be written as :
Expenses * 100 Sales
And then broken down into
Distribution Costs * 100 Sales
and
Admin Costs * 100 Sales
and
Interest * 100 Sales
Basically replace the top line with whatever expenses you need to include.
The expenses ratio is working out what expenses have been necessary to generate the amount of sales that have been processed for the period.
The expenses ratio's are the bottom level of the profitability and efficiency ratio heirarchy on the profitability side.
I'm sure that you've already come accross the hierarchy (sometimes refered to as a pyramid) in your studies. If not it's something that you will come accross time and again. There's a bit too much to it to detail here but suffice that you know that all of the major ratio's interact to break down the ROCE so that one can determine from the ratio's what is causing the changes to profitability or efficiency.
I appreciate that you probably wanted a simple formulae type answer but that's not really how ratio's work (liquidity / gearing and investment ratio's excepted) and a lot is down to the skill and judgement of the accountant as to what figures are included in the analysis for a given situation.
This of course is why ratio formulae are never gven in accountancy exams where things such as coefficients of correlation and annuity tables are as those are constants where as ratio's involve judgement.
Bet your now more confused than when you asked the question!
simple answer would be
Expenses * 100 Sales
All the best,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
I decided that too many people who read this wouldn't have a clue what's being talked about when I speak about the ratio Hierarchy and as one can never have enough knowledge I thought that I would just give a very brief overview of the profitability and efficiency ratio's. James, this should make it clear where the expenses ratio fits in the greater scheme of things. Really wish that one could take this into exams... Life would be so much easier.
Hope that this clarifies matters and sparks the interest of some others who might be thinking about going from bookkeeping into accountancy.
Have fun,
Shaun.
P.S. Sorry, just replaced the diagram as realised that on the second level of the profitability side ratio's I used the PBIT where it should really have been PAIT which is a more useful productivity indicator and ties in with interest being seperated out at the lower expenses level.
-- Edited by Shamus on Wednesday 19th of May 2010 11:45:55 AM
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
cheers, I thought about doing it in Visio but opted for my old favorite Excel... I really love that product despite what Microsoft keep doing to it.
Hi Steve,
from your other posts I'm sure that you'll really enjoy it when you move on to analysis of accounts.
As mentioned in my first post though it's getting into the area where there are often multiple right ways of doing calculations so it's more based on why you want to know a ratio rather than a preset this is how it's done.
That said, if everyone uses the calculations as set out above then it would be preset and life would be a darn site easier for us all.... Never going to happen of course but one can dream of a world where ten accountants in a room would all come out with the same answer to a straight question!!!
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
it's just a box of shapes really that you join together.
Every different design methodology has it's own structure and most of them (BPMN, UML, SSADM, Flowcharts, structure charts, etc.) are either available through Visio or Visio objects can be recycled to make a relevant diagram which pretty much makes it the tool of choice amongst systems analysts and designers.
Along with Excel, Word and Powerpoint its an expected skill rather than something that you would bother putting on your CV if you work in back office operations in banking.
Its a real shame that Microsoft (1) don't bundle it with any version of office and (2) make so many of the shapes only available in the (ridiculously expensive for what it is) professional version.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Just drew someone elses attention to this old (2010) thread and spotted a couple of things that I would do differently now.
The bottom level of the efficiency ratio's should be changed to
Inventory Days : (Closing Inventory / Cost of Sales) * 365
Payable Days : (Trade Payables / Cost of Sales) * 365
Debtor Days : (Trade Debtors / Sales) * 365
Also, for Net Capital employed I now use the faster simpler version of Total Assets - Current Liabilities
kind regards,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Hi Sam
You could help Jay out with his ratio questions, but it sounds like you wouldnt enjoy them as much as Shaun and I did. Does that make us weird?!