The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Payroll Schemes.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 827
Date:
Payroll Schemes.
Permalink Closed


Hopefully someone can help me with this.

Is it possible to register a new employer without a UTR and without having to use a simplified payoll scheme, they are all employing a personal assistants?. I'm having a bit of a nightmare trying to find software that handles simplified schemes. Does anyone know any?

I was looking at the possibilty of just opening "regular" schemes that would allow me to stick with my current software but in order to do this online the client needs a utr. The "employers" are all in receipt of direct payments and therefore not engaged in any employment.

I really don't want to do this manually, due to volume and even HMRC seem to be having problems enabling their own software to the schemes I've registered so far.



-- Edited by ADAS on Tuesday 23rd of November 2010 06:08:43 PM

__________________
Tony

Responses are intended as outline only. Formal advice should be sort from your Institutes Technical Department or a suitably qualified Accountant.
.


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 345
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'm sure I've registered new employers without UTR's. I def. had full names, adresses, NI numbers and dates of birth.

__________________
Sue
Assist Office Services - Bradford Bookkeeper


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 709
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Tony,

I deal with Direct Payments 'employers' payroll.

I use the online 'register as a sole trader' form, and leave the UTR blank. It hasn't been questioned or caused any problems so far. I then operate the payroll as usual (I use Moneysoft) to produce the wage slip etc each month. The assistants that my clients have earn over £700 pm so the simplified scheme doesn't apply anyway.

__________________

Jenny

 

Responses are my opinion based on the information provided.  All information should be thoroughly checked before being relied on.

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 827
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks a lot ladies, it's appreciated.

I ended up calling HMRC yesterday, the lady I spoke to was really helpful. Her advice, though I'm sure it's not official, was basically to avoid using simplified schemes. She even cancelled the ones I'd opened and re-opened standard schemes for me.

__________________
Tony

Responses are intended as outline only. Formal advice should be sort from your Institutes Technical Department or a suitably qualified Accountant.
.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hello Tony (sorry I know it's an old post)

I am in the process of offering this service to my Local Authority service users having worked in financial assessments for many years. Do you still avoid the simplified schemes and use the standard scheme?

Also, what do you pass onto the service users (employers/clients), the payment amounts to their personal assistants and a total of what is to be paid to HMRC with a deadline date? The LA I'm dealing with have informed me that the MLR procedures and customer due diligence do not apply to payroll services (only managed accounts) but I am not sure of this and have emailed the AAT and HMRC for further clarification. Do you apply your MLR procedures to these clients?

Thanks

Dean

__________________

www.bensteadbook-keeping.co.uk



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 827
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Dean

No need to apologise bud.

Definitely stick with standard schemes.

In terms of the info I pass on it's really no different to any other client , in terms of paperwork.

They get:

1. 2 x Payslip for each period - one for the PA to keep and the other for the PA to sign and the SU to keep as evidence (your LA will probably audit them at some point)
2. Quarterly P32.
3. Amendement Form

I don't know how the agreements work with your LA but basically all my clients have a set number of hours awarded at a set rate. It's a good idea to send an "Amendment Form" with each payslip. That way the onus is on the SU or PA to keep you informed of changes.

I don't actually deal with the LA. A local charity runs the service on the LA's behalf and they got me involved when the hit a bottleneck. So your situation might be a little different.

The charity asked me to organise the quarterly payments for the SU to HMRC. Following a discussion with ICB and a suitably worded Letter of Engagement I'm "willing" to do this but I insist on express permission to make payments from the SU's bank account. Some clients don't like me doing this - which suits me to be honest.

This is largely the reason why I use standard schemes. Plus the small matter of 12Pay not handling simplified schemes

Personally, I insist on MLR compliance and due diligence. I'm not saying your LA is wrong, but I'd rather be safe and comply and I don't see how the SU is anything other than a client if as in my case, you're paid directly by the SU not the LA. But the AAT will give you the definitive answer.

hth

__________________
Tony

Responses are intended as outline only. Formal advice should be sort from your Institutes Technical Department or a suitably qualified Accountant.
.


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Date:
Permalink Closed

HI,

 

Thanks for the detailed response, that has given me more than enough information to go on so that's much appreciated. Plus, I never thought about two payslips and obviously that makes a lot of sense.

 

Thanks for your help

 

Dean



__________________

www.bensteadbook-keeping.co.uk

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About