The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: question re. Vat situation inherited


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
question re. Vat situation inherited
Permalink Closed


Have just started at a firm which is 15 mths old have never submitted any accounts and manual records have generated the quarterly vat returns thus far. 
Internal controls don't look good ditto bank recs.
Part of my brief was to reinvent the wheel, reconcile the bank and post transactions retrospectively onto sage which we have now done and we are in a position to file a set of accounts. An audit is imminent too.
If we're now confident that the books and records agree to the transactions and we have the paperwork to back up the cumulative vat position...is it enough to just submit the next vat return with the cumulative data we can vouch for and effectively come clean on a catch up (probably payable)? Or do I have to embark on the mother of all reconcilliations to vouch all the individual errors that have occurred and all the ommissions and mispostings of the previous 15mths! The back up documentation is slightly better than the back of an envelope. How useful and neccessary would such a reconcilliation be even if it is possible? Any help much appreciated. Thankyou. 



__________________
gbm


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 896
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Jimmy,

As long as the net adjustments are less than £10,000 (and can therefore be done on the next VAT return), I think I would be inclined to work out the cumulative figures for all boxes, then deduct anything previously reported on the VAT returns. This cleans up everything, and you have the records to show your workings.

__________________

 

Regards,
Nick

Website: www.gbmaccounts.co.uk
Twitter

Factsheet | Starting a Business

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 709
Date:
Permalink Closed

That is exactly what I would do, and have had accepted by VAT inspectors in the past. To find and explain all the errors would take forever!

__________________

Jenny

 

Responses are my opinion based on the information provided.  All information should be thoroughly checked before being relied on.

 



Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks guys. I agree that reconcilliation is a soul destroying and to my mind pointless task. Equally so long as we're comfortable with the liability at the yr end I can't think that the auditors would care, would they?
Cheers

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About