I am planning to file my account in the Companies House through webfiling this month.
In fact, there was no trading activities in this accounting period though given the fact that the last-filed accounts were small company, abbreviated accounts, exempt from being audited which is not dormant accounts, therefore the status is "trading" and I need to file by using the abbreviated accounts template online.
My B/S previous ending essentially shows only Cash, Creditors and Share Capital as below:
Current Assets
Cash at bank in hand:50
Creditors (amounts due within 1 year):(800)
Total assets less current liabilities:(750)
Net Assets:£(750)
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital:2
Profit and loss account:(752)
Shareholders fund:£(750)
All what were done during this period are:
-I made write-off all creditors balances as bad debts, which were in Directors Current Account
-I as a company director withdrew all cash at bank
-We did not do anything for the share capital
Given the above transactions, can I just put Nil everywhere by just staying put the share capital as it is, means keep 2 in Called up share capital and Shareholders fund?
Assuming that you're happy with the transactions and that you withdrew the cash and reduced the DLA to £750 before writing it off, then yes you will have £2 share capital and (£2) P&L account.
If you wrote the DLA off and THEN withdrew the £50, you would create an overdrawn DLA - hence my point about the order.
- "Assuming that you're happy with the transactions and that you withdrew the cash and reduced the DLA to £750 before writing it off, then yes you will have £2 share capital and (£2) P&L account.", in this case my b/s should be as follows, correct?
Current Assets
Cash at bank in hand: Nil
Creditors (amounts due within 1 year):Nil
Total assets less current liabilities:Nil
Net Assets:Nil
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital:2
Profit and loss account:(2)
Shareholders fund:Nil
- "If you wrote the DLA off and THEN withdrew the £50, you would create an overdrawn DLA", in this case, is there any change I should make in the above b/s?
Again allow me to throw layman's question, what exactly does the below b/s express?
Can it be interpreted that the £2 issued share value was offset by £2 loss of operation carried over from the previous period, which resulted in no capital in the company?
No, there is no physical assets & liabilities now.
In our last annual return, 2 issued shares are recorded as Paid Up, so yes there is supposed to be the actual value of £2 (honestly speaking we don't have any memory of £2 payment to the company bank account for this though we somehow reported like that when we filed the annual return)
What concerns me here is:
- Can I show zero share capital (shareholders fund) in the balance sheet while claiming it's an existing company? In other words, can the company be kept registered in the Comapny House without actual issued-share (our company has 1,000 authorized share capital with £1 each, and issued only 2 shares which is now being withdrawn by this transaction in the B/S, correct)?
Again, appreciate your assistance on this basic issue.
You still have £2 of issued share capital, which is just balanced by a £2 loss (brought foward from the previous period).
Yes, you can have a zero balance sheet (in fact, it's possible to have a negative balance sheet). You might want to add a "going concern" note to your balance sheet, assuming you wish to continue trading.
If your balance sheet is completely unchanged by the time the next set of accounts is due, then there is no reason why you can't file exactly the same figures. (To do otherwise would be wrong, surely? :)
I tried to complete account filing with the above b/s through webfilling today, but can't submit by being blocked by the system saying:
"BALANCE SHEET MANDATORY FIELDS NOT FILLED: THE FIGURES ON THE BALANCE SHEET HAVE CHANGED OR NOT BEEN CHECKED. PLEASE RE-CHECK THEM. NOTES SHEET MANDATORY FIELDS NOT FILLED:"
My b/s requires input (already 0 is in ) or change in the below 3 titles with *, I called up the Companies House but they said this is not a technical issue but need to discuss with the accountants.
Could you kindly advise how I can sort out this problem?
Total assets less current liabilities * 0
Total net assets (liabilities) * 0
Capital and reserves Called up share capital 2 Profit and loss account (2) Shareholders funds * 0
Yes, you're absolutely right, the template can't handle 0 balances, and their e-mail response (I had also sent the inquiry by e-mail) said "it should be noted that a company's issued share capital is also deemed as an asset" that obviously suggests £2 assets record.
Honestly speaking, I would not like to be stuck with this tiny issue but move forward with the b/s of: This PeriodPrevious Period
Current Assets
Cash at bank in hand: 2 50
Creditors (amounts due within 1 year): 0 (800)
Total assets less current liabilities: 2 (750)
Net Assets: 2 £(750)
Capital and reserves
Called up share capital: 2 2
Profit and loss account: 0 (752)
Shareholders fund: 2 £(750)
With the notes of: - Director withdrew the cash of £48 and reduced the Directors Current Account into £752 before writing off the creditors balance. - The company made write-off the creditors balance (amounts due within 1 year) of £752 as bad debt.
Would you see any problems in this filing?
I would really appreciate your cordial assistance.
But that does defeat the idea of the fourm in that only one person has gained from Louises knowledge.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
I sent my private e-mail to Louise directly because I was wondering if addressing to her real name of "Louise" rather than "Figurate" in public forum somehow made her feel uncomfortable.
However, fortunately it wasn't the case and could receive the answer from her, the below is its extraction of relevant part of this topic for forum readers - I'm sure Louise doesn't have any problems with this publication:
The only thing I was going to say was that your balance sheet added up mathematically ;)
I couldnt actually say whether it was correct or not, or whether there would be any problems with it, as I have no idea if you actually had £2 in the bank/petty cash at the date of your balance sheet (which is effectively what you are saying) and whether on examination of your actual records the accounts & notes you presented in your post is a true and fair view of the events and position at the balance sheet date.
I was also going to say that you may also want to check the grammar in your notes (which I didnt want to write on a public forum)
Have a look at the sample accounts (bizarrely on the HMRC website, as opposed to Companies House)
There are links to various samples (eg full accounts, abbreviated accounts etc) near the bottom of the page.
This will give you an idea of what is expected (although its not exhaustive)
You dont mention anything about Corporation Tax, but if the company wasnt dormant, then its usual to send a full set of accounts to HMRC along with the CT600 (Corporation Tax Return).
its easy done that things go offline. There used to be a facility on the site where you could post private messages but it ended up with threads that made little sense as whole chunks were missing so site admin removed the private messaging facility.
kind regards,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Just to say, sorry this thread went off-forum. Although, it was for the genuine reason which Vinci has already explained. (Actually, I'm quite touched that someone was that worried about causing offence - even if it was unfounded, lol)
As it happened, I didn't particularly feel that I had anything additional to say (which is probably evident from my reply to Vinci's email )
@ Vinci - I'm glad I was of some help, all the same, and I hope you've managed to sort it all out now.
In fact, your CT600 reminder made me think about the consistency of 2 different reporting (to HMRC & Companies House).
For HMRC, I already confirmed that they have recorded the company as Dormant, thus we haven't received Notice to Deliver from them.
For Companies House, although I started this thread by saying In fact, there was no trading activities in this accounting period though given the fact that the last-filed accounts were small company, abbreviated accounts, exempt from being audited which is not dormant accounts, therefore the status is "trading" and I need to file by using the abbreviated accounts template online., on my second thought, I realized that the trading status doesnt impose me to file only the active account but I can file dormant account alternatively I must have misunderstood the Company Houses guideline.
Having said, I prepared the dormant company account yesterday in paper form - AA02 is only available form related with dormant account in webfiling and this form can be used only by the company that never traded since inception, thus for us who becomes dormant after trading should use paper form we can use the sample in HMRC that Louise sent, and mail to the Companies House (just information for everybody).
However, again I started wondering if we can really consider this as dormant because yes we didnt do any trading but we wrote-off the bad debts by making the loss account in the previous period nil, which is the transaction in P/L account.
Thus I re-checked Companies House GP2 Chapter 8 (copied & pasted as below) to make sure what Im doing is right, but the above write-off of bad debt is not included as disregard transactions, and its not clear the write-off could be viewed as a significant accounting transaction, so I just sent my inquiry about this point to Companies House.
1. What is a dormant company?
A company is dormant if it has had no 'significant accounting transactions' during the accounting period. A significant accounting transaction is one which the company should enter in its accounting records.
When determining whether a company is dormant you can disregard the following transactions:
payment for shares taken by subscribers to the memorandum of association;
fees paid to the Registrar of Companies for a change of company name, the re-registration of a company and filing annual returns; and
payment of a civil penalty for late filing of accounts.
I just received the response and the conclusion is they cant provide the answer because its purely an accounting issue, the extraction is:
The primary function of Companies House is that of a Registry; documents are received in good faith.It is the responsibility of the company submitting its documents to ensure that the information contained therein is truthful and accurate.Accounts are processed subject to examination policy checks, in accordance with placing them onto the public record. When Companies House examines accounts it only make basic checks on them, for example to ensure that the appropriate documents are there, that they are for the correct financial year and that they have been signed. If, subsequently, we receive a complaint that the accounts do not comply with the Companies Acts in some way we have a duty to draw this to the companys attention and, if appropriate, to ask for a set of revised accounts which do comply with the requirements. The GP2 booklet provides basic guidance only.Unfortunately, this is not some thing that can be answered by Companies House.
To me, there are 2 options:
1. Submit dormant account in paper form assuming the write-off activity is not a significant transaction, then perfect consistency with the dormant reporting to HMRC.
2. Submit abbrebiated b/s (not dormant) via webfiling (the most convenient way) and will submit dormant account for the next account (assuming no trading activities this period), without any particular notice to HMRC because there is virtually no tax related reporting matters.
Could you finally shed light on this point?
Probably, the case I have posted in this thread is unique but still believe it informative & helpful for many forum readers.
Appreciate your assistance.
Best regards,
Vinci
-- Edited by Vinci on Wednesday 3rd of August 2011 12:03:05 PM
Personally, I dont think it was dormant. Your CT600, wil probably be minimal, though, but it would be due wirhin 12mths of your year end. (and any tax would be due within 9mths). Did you know you can "joint" file (to both Co Hse and HMRC ) using hmrc's free pdf software.
This discussion gives me the valuable opportunity to review my current accounting details & what I have actually done, and I feel I am doing wrong accounting procedure with probably unnecessary objective of making the b/s clean (just leaving share capital).
Honestly speaking, we didnt do anything during this accounting period, the below is the exact situation:
-Originally, I said I withdrew all the cash at bank though there had been no cash at bank but only in hand, virtually we didnt do anything for the cash
-Bad debt as an administrative expense is a part of the loss in P/L account, and the loss is in Directors current account which is in Creditors in B/S, and physically I didnt do anything on the bad debt
Having said, would you foresee any problems if I file the account that is exactly the same as the previous period as a dormant account please see the below B/S I shared in my 1st post, and if its ok, what would be the problems if I keep filing the same account until I resume trading?
Vinci said: "Originally, I said I withdrew all the cash at bank though there had been no cash at bank but only in hand, virtually we didnt do anything for the cash Bad debt as an administrative expense is a part of the loss in P/L account, and the loss is in Directors current account which is in Creditors in B/S, and physically I didnt do anything on the bad debt"
LOL, I think we may be in danger of going round in circles here Of course it's a VERY good idea to be consistent with HMRC and Companies House, because that opens up all sorts of questions, the obvious one being - why the difference?? In light of your new information, possibly the company was dormant. But only you know what you have or haven't done, iyswim
So, to recap what I've already said: "If your balance sheet is completely unchanged by the time the next set of accounts is due, then there is no reason why you can't file exactly the same figures. (To do otherwise would be wrong, surely? :)" and "I couldn't actually say whether it was correct or not, or whether there would be any problems with it, as I have no idea if you actually had £2 [which you've now amended to £50] in the bank/petty cash..." etc
Vinci, have you thought that it might be a good idea to pay someone such as Louise what would be a very small amount to file this for you correctly! She has already given you lots of good advice and that has taken time!
__________________
Phil Hendy, The Accountancy Mentor
Are you thinking of setting up your own practice or have you set up and need some help?
If so a mentor may be the way forward - feel free to get in touch and see how I can assist you.