The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Why does HMRC think not claiming any VAT on fuel would be a "useful option".


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 100
Date:
Why does HMRC think not claiming any VAT on fuel would be a "useful option".
Permalink Closed


 

To claim or not to claim, that is the question.

I'm trying to get my head round how to deal with claiming back VAT on fuel for a limited company, VAT registered BUT below the VAT threshold, small amount of business travel all of which is done in the Director's personal car.

On this HMRC web page http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/vat/managing/reclaiming/motoring.htm , I read the following:

If your business pays for road fuel, you can deal with the VAT charged on the fuel in one of four ways:

  • Reclaim all of the VAT. You must use the fuel only for business purposes.
  • Reclaim all of the VAT and pay the appropriate fuel scale charge - this is a way of accounting for output tax on fuel that your business buys but that's then used for private motoring.
  • Reclaim only the VAT that relates to fuel used for business mileage. You'll need to keep detailed records of your business and private mileage.
  • Not reclaim any VAT. This can be a useful option if your mileage is low and also if you use the fuel for both business and private motoring. If you choose this option you must apply it to all vehicles including commercial vehicles.

I can see that the first and second options are not appropriate. So it's either the third or the fourth. 

My question is, why would anyone want to take the fourth option? Why would it be "useful" to claim nothing rather than something? Is it just that the work necessary to calculate the business mileage is not worth the effort for the likely amount that could be claimed?  Or is there something I'm missing? 

 

 



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 71
Date:
Permalink Closed

The only way I see the last option as useful has nothing to do with fuel, more to do with deciding to register for VAT or not. Maybe someone else who's dealt with this more will have a better answer...


__________________

Please correct me if I'm wrong... I am only human sucking up knowledge... Sometimes bits leak out!

Solus Bookkeeping and Admin Services



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 143
Date:
Permalink Closed

If the vehicle has a CO2 band of say 190 you would apply a Fuel Scale Charge of £147.00 gross ie £24.50 Vat would be repaid to HMRC but if your fuel account was only £150 a month for that particular vehicle, you would be worse off as you would only being claiming £17.50 of input VAT. This can be the case especially where there are several vehicles all doing low mileage. Hence Option 4.

__________________

Roz



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 421
Date:
Permalink Closed

numbnumber wrote:

If the vehicle has a CO2 band of say 190 you would apply a Fuel Scale Charge of £147.00 gross ie £24.50 Vat would be repaid to HMRC but if your fuel account was only £150 a month for that particular vehicle, you would be worse off as you would only being claiming £17.50 of input VAT. This can be the case especially where there are several vehicles all doing low mileage. Hence Option 4.


That looks like an argument against option 2, but not an argument against option 3. (unless I'm misunderstanding things fuel scale charges don't apply to option 3)

Perhaps the thought is that if the mileage is low the administrative effort in keeping proper records of business mileage vs private mileage outweighs the small amount of VAT that can be reclaimed. I probably do 1-200 miles on business/year and I couldn't be bothered to reclaim the VAT for that.

What seems really odd about those rules is the apparent stricture in the last sentence of option 4 that the moment you've decided to not reclaim VAT for one vehicle (because the admin wouldn't be worth it for that vehicle) you cannot reclaim it for any vehicle. That rule just seems in place to annoy!



-- Edited by Tom McClelland on Thursday 20th of October 2011 10:33:38 AM

__________________

Life's a reach, then you gybe

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:
Permalink Closed

It is a useful option if the Output VAT you pay on the scale charge is greater than the VAT that you reclaim on the fuel!!!!

__________________

Your local accountant

 

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 421
Date:
Permalink Closed

Truemanbrown wrote:

It is a useful option if the Output VAT you pay on the scale charge is greater than the VAT that you reclaim on the fuel!!!!


 Correct me if I'm wrong, but option 3 has no scale charge associated with it.



__________________

Life's a reach, then you gybe

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:
Permalink Closed

Tom McClelland wrote:
Truemanbrown wrote:

It is a useful option if the Output VAT you pay on the scale charge is greater than the VAT that you reclaim on the fuel!!!!


 Correct me if I'm wrong, but option 3 has no scale charge associated with it.


 That is correct, but you obviously need to keep very detailed mileage records to separate business from private fuel.



__________________

Your local accountant

 

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 100
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thank you all for your replies.

Tom McClelland, you are right, I had ruled out the scale charge option entirely - I was just unable to see why anyone would choose Option 4 (i.e. not claiming any VAT) over Option 3 (detailed mileage records). The consensus seems to be that the reason must be to avoid paperwork and record keeping.

Because only one vehicle is involved in this case, I had not spotted the oddity that you mentioned, " the moment you've decided to not reclaim VAT for one vehicle (because the admin wouldn't be worth it for that vehicle) you cannot reclaim it for any vehicle. "

That does seem harsh. The only justification I can think of is that if people were to submit VAT claims under several different calculation schemes for several different vehicles so many errors would result that neither those submitting nor HMRC can keep track of them. Perhaps there would also be opportunities for fraud hidden in all the detail. That's just my guess as to the reason. Or perhaps they just felt like being evil today!



-- Edited by chatcat on Saturday 22nd of October 2011 11:41:29 AM

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About