The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Expense classification - signwriting on a van


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Expense classification - signwriting on a van
Permalink Closed


What classification of expense would you say signwriting on a  van was?

Is it advertising? Or included with motor expenses? Or another one I haven't thought of.

This signwriting was not done at the time the van was purchased but rather several months later.



__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'd say advertising.

__________________

Advice from beyond the grave!!!

E&OE



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Peasie,

they've had this arguement over on accounting web. Have a read of this thread :

http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/vehicle-livery-capital-expenditure

You will of course end up no better off than the position that you are in now as one accountant argues it as Revenue expenditure and the ex tax inspector states that it's capital expenditure.

You might enjoy the HMRC bashing (by the ex inspector) in the final post of the thread.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Permalink Closed

I was inclined to go for advertising. That's partly why I mentioned about it being several months after the van was bought (as one of the posts on accountingweb says).

Now the next problem....advertising is currently a direct expense in Sage but I'd hardly say advertising on a van is a direct expense. It's for a plumbing business - I suppose on occasion it has been direct, they have been spotted at one job and asked to go to another house.

__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Peasie

This my help  when i was doing my Level III in Self assessment in one of the Assignments there was a value for advertising this included the cost of a new  sign to put over the shop .

the assessment was to do the adjusted profit and loss account and the value of the new sign was in fact a disallowable expenses as i had to add it back  so we can only conclued that the sign was a capital expense .

 

I would therefore be inclined to treat the sign for the van in the same way depending on its cost as a capital expenses

it will be Interesting to know  what the other guys think

  Marty

  



-- Edited by nautica on Friday 10th of February 2012 01:01:16 PM



-- Edited by nautica on Friday 10th of February 2012 01:03:33 PM

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

I can see both points, however this is something you would be putting on after buying the van, and taking off before selling the van, in my mind both of these would be an advertising expense. Like if you bought a premises as a shop, would you capitalise putting a sign up?



__________________
Steve


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1716
Date:
Permalink Closed

It seems like a permanent hoarding to me and would almost certainly last over 2 years unless the vehicle was sold. We don't know are the £'s paid to check the materiality. Paradoxically, it could conceivably cost more than the original asset to 'renew' the signwriting if the original faded.

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1536
Date:
Permalink Closed

Tim don't mention hoarding when Peasie is around!

__________________


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

lol Neil...

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.

gbm


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 896
Date:
Permalink Closed

I would be inclined to expense it as advertising - if someone bought the van, the only reason they'd want to keep your business name on it would be if they were also buying the business.

__________________

 

Regards,
Nick

Website: www.gbmaccounts.co.uk
Twitter

Factsheet | Starting a Business

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

My take is similar.

I would say a shop sign is a fixture & fitting, and therefore a capital expense.

Likewise I would say sign writing a van is a capital expense, as it will last as long as the van, or as long as the van is owned by the business. I would also consider adding the expected cost of removing sign writing to the actual cost value, as it it will be necessary to remove it when sold.

 



__________________

 

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink Closed

I am with you on this one Wella  capital expentiture

Marty



__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 69
Date:
Permalink Closed

Wella

 

Having read more of your opinions on this thread I am some what inclined to have a rethink on the matter and looking at it from a new angel if the sign writing was to be painted on to the van then you could say that this was just advertising and therefore revenue expenditure.

But then on the other hand if the sign was of the magnetic kind that you put on when trading and take off when using the van for your one use then there could be an argument for capital expenditure.  

Marty  



-- Edited by nautica on Friday 10th of February 2012 10:44:09 PM

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2085
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'd go for advertising and pr. This thread just shows how bookkeeping is open to opinion, as long a s you can justify why you did what you did.

Kris

__________________

BKN Most Innovative Accountancy Firm 2012

Director and Co-Founder of The Bookkeepers Alliance

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Couldn't agree more Kris

While my opinion in the broad view is as I have stated, at the end of the day I would probably expense it based on materiality. just got be consistent in how it is treated.

 

 



__________________

 

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Just to give food for thought.

How would others interpret this extract from BIM42550

"Ordinary current expenditure on advertising the trader's goods or services (for example, on newspaper advertisements, distribution of free samples of the goods dealt in) is allowable.

Where the expenditure is on the erection of permanent hoardings or other apparatus of a durable nature, it is disallowable as capital expenditure."

Which I think is what Tim alluded to in his earlier post

Would a van be an "apparatus of a durable nature"?



__________________

 

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1716
Date:
Permalink Closed

lol Neil.

I was referring to Shauns accountingweb link but maybe we could contrive something to avoid needing a signwriter in the first place. Over to you, Peasie.

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Marty

Again, just my opinion but as there is a permanance about both types of signage, I would have been inclined to capitalise both types. However on a materiality basis, the magnetic signs can be relatively cheap, so would probably expense them.

Just as example, for clarity on why I think this way. If Eddy Stobart places an ad in a national newspaper, it may cost him £5000, after a day it's landfill (sorry, recycled).

 The livery on his trucks (which are massive transfers), probably cost tens of £1000 for the fleet, and have a useful life of x years depending on how long they keep the trucks, therefore the "advertising" is spread over several years. When the truck is sold, the signwriting has reached the end of its useful life, and will cost him money to "dispose" of it. He will not want the livery to stay on the trucks when he sells them, so the cost to remove the transfers should be factored into the capital cost.

Any repairs to the sign writing, say if it got scraped on a wall, would be like any other repair to an asset, an expense.

Edit: Just an afterthought but it could also be construde, that if the cost of an asset, is the total cost of bringing it in to service, this could include the sign writing.

Bill



-- Edited by Wella on Saturday 11th of February 2012 10:02:14 AM

__________________

 

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Must be feeling particullarly nurdy today. Just had a scout round, and found the 2011 Annual report for Eddie Stobart. no

They depreciate their vehicles, and trailers at 14%-33% straight line, so they keep them for between 3 and 7 years.

They also carry on the balance sheet Branding, and the costs of brand harmonisation.

Maybe sign writing should be thought of as branding, rather than advertising?

 Edit: Curse you Peasie for starting this smile



-- Edited by Wella on Saturday 11th of February 2012 12:22:26 PM

__________________

 

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1536
Date:
Permalink Closed

If Eddy Stobart placed an ad it would be a miracle lol.

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Morning Neil

Just a made up example.

However, his branding isn't all that - we both spelt Eddie wrong no

Bill



__________________

 

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1536
Date:
Permalink Closed

I only spelled it wrong because i was copying from one of my idols lol.

I knew what you meant Bill, just having a cheeky moment.

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 77
Date:
Permalink Closed

Id look at the cost and then decide, if its a small amount i would put it through as capital, however the arguement for capital expenditure is also a valuable arguement. your callsmile



__________________

      Z I G S 


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Zigs

At the end of the day, despite my overall thoughts on the subject, it would be down to the actaul cost, in the grand scheme of things as to how I would treat the sign writing.

Bill



__________________

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About