The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Here's a hum-dinger of a question....


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 506
Date:
Here's a hum-dinger of a question....
Permalink Closed


Driving instructor... both professional (for businesses etc) and private (your son/daughter type)

Is a Snooper GPS Speed Detector an allowable expense??? Discuss: confuse

 



__________________

Gary

W: www.backtoblackbooks.co.uk    E: gary@backtoblackbooks.co.uk     t: @backtoblackBK



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2085
Date:
Permalink Closed

They are sold as safety devices, and are completely legal to sell, buy, own and use in the UK. On this basis I would say it's no less allowable than a new computer or fancy phone.

Kris

__________________

BKN Most Innovative Accountancy Firm 2012

Director and Co-Founder of The Bookkeepers Alliance

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 506
Date:
Permalink Closed

Saftey device for what though?? surely he should be teaching students to drive within the speed limits... therefore should not need one. A van driver may have the nessessity to have one... but a driving instructor...?

(healthy debate... not getting at anyone ;) )

__________________

Gary

W: www.backtoblackbooks.co.uk    E: gary@backtoblackbooks.co.uk     t: @backtoblackBK



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yeah a safety device as speed cameras really do nothing for safety if not make it worse, they are a means of creating revenue, nothing else.

__________________
Steve


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 33
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've claimed for a TomTom SatNav (which just happens to have a built in GPS speed camera database) which I need to find where I'm going. The speed camera locator is a bonus wink  Maybe your driving instructor would be better going down this route, unless already bought the snooper, in which case I'd say try it.  If asked, could always say it's used to teach pupils about "safety cameras" biggrin



__________________
gbm


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 896
Date:
Permalink Closed

Wholly, exclusively and necessary for running your trade. Think it may fall down on necessary.

__________________

 

Regards,
Nick

Website: www.gbmaccounts.co.uk
Twitter

Factsheet | Starting a Business

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Permalink Closed

gbm wrote:

Wholly, exclusively and necessary for running your trade. Think it may fall down on necessary.


I thought it was just wholly and exclsuively - the necessary but only came into things when it was for employees claiming expenses. 



__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Peasie,

your right.

As this is something that comes up a lot I just had a look around the interweb to see if I could find a nice document that explains in not too complex terms the legal standing of the term and came accross this excellent AAT CPD doc... So get it quick because anytime that they realise that they've accidentally left anything in the public domain that's useful they drag it behind their members only area!

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=%20wholly%20necessarily%20exclusively%20self%20employed%20hmrc&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CFsQFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aat-interactive.org.uk%2Fcpdmp3%2Ftrans%2F2010%2F2%2FTax%2520Relief%2520for%2520Business%2520Expenses%2520for%2520the%2520Self%2520Employed.doc&ei=u1DKT4azFeew0QWC4P3nAQ&usg=AFQjCNEETq5L_WQFrAS3L0qk-1AsjKbixQ&cad=rja

It's a word document and I've just printed my copy off (only 6 pages).

kind regards,

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.

gbm


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 896
Date:
Permalink Closed

Peasie wrote:
gbm wrote:

Wholly, exclusively and necessary for running your trade. Think it may fall down on necessary.


I thought it was just wholly and exclsuively - the necessary but only came into things when it was for employees claiming expenses. 


Oops! That'll teach me to do 5 things at once!  Sorry, have dealt with a few expense claims recently and was in 'employee' mode. 



__________________

 

Regards,
Nick

Website: www.gbmaccounts.co.uk
Twitter

Factsheet | Starting a Business

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About