The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: HMRC late filing penalties


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:
HMRC late filing penalties
Permalink Closed


Hi,

Just taken on a new client who is a mobile hairdresser.  She has been self-employed for the last 3 tax years and never completed a self-assessment.  She now has penalties and is paying them weekly.

I have submitted the online return and will be doing the paper ones this evening for the previous years.

I need some guidance on how to word a letter to HMRC as I want to appeal my clients penalties on the grounds that it is her first offence, she is a single mother earning very little and now has someone doing her tax returns every year so it will not happen again.

What are the chances that the remaining penalties will be removed once the Tax Returns have been received by HMRC and also in receipt of an appeal letter?

 



__________________
E Roscoe


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 287
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Elaine

I don't hold out much hope of the penalties being waived, but certainly worth a try.  I had a client, who having started her business on 2nd April thought she didn't need to file a return until the following year, assuming that her year ran 1st April - 31st March.  Inland Revenue wanted a return from 2nd - 5th April and issued a penalty.  After becoming involved I appealed on her behalf but they turned it down.

Why paper returns out of interest?  If you're doing the latest one online can't you do the other two online as well?



__________________

John



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi John,

I did them all online using Andica.

Elaine

__________________
E Roscoe


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Elaine
Im speaking from a moral view - why should she get away with not paying penalties when she clearly knew that she was breaking the rules earning money for three years and not attempting to pay tax nor find out what kind of tax bill she has, or not. I hate that the single mother card is likely to be used in these circumstances - I am a single mother and worked hard and paid my tax!! Sorry but I dont think you should be fighting for getting anything back except for the fines since you took over perhaps (ie at that date she started to do something about it/need time to sort blur blur, although thats still all her fault so why the revenue would be soft on her is in doubt). Leave her to fight the battle I say. Wonder is she has put all her cash clients through!

Right I will get off my high horse now!





__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 244
Date:
Permalink Closed

If we are to start talking from some view of morality, my starting point would be that penalties should be progressive and proportionate, rather than absolute and virtually indiscriminate.

The carpet bombing of computer-generated one hundred pound penalties for the merest reporting mistake, misunderstanding or even actual fault - that is what is iniquitous, the more so when HMRC can be so lax, so unconcerned and so untouchable when failing its own responsibilities to taxpayers.

I have found the effort of interceding for any of my clients, who might have erred against the Almighty Rules, has been worth it for my client relationship, and generally successful. Full marks to Elaine for wanting to go the extra mile for her client.

Now I'll get off my hobby horse too.
Andy

__________________
Andrew


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1716
Date:
Permalink Closed

Couldn't have put it better myself Andrew.

www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_374941.pdf

If these median income figures on pg11 are correct and the average tax bill for the self employed is under £500 then what are we doing charging multiples of £300 for late filing? If the tax is paid eventually, these are not just disproportionate, they are immoral.

Let's not pretend they are about enforcing the rules when they are merely using the self employed as a milch cow. These are the people who work longer hours and are entitled to few benefits and statutory rights. It would make just as much sense to fine a new employee a hundred quid for not handing in their P45.

Tim



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 287
Date:
Permalink Closed

I do think the penalties draconian once the £10 a day kicks in, but ultimately the responsibility still lies with the tax payer to get the return done in time.



__________________

John



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 319
Date:
Permalink Closed

I think if you cant submit a form within 9 months you deserve to be fined. Bit harsh for a Sunday morning but my opinion none the less.

__________________

Matthew



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

AICB wrote:

 my starting point would be that penalties should be progressive and proportionate, rather than absolute and virtually indiscriminate.

The carpet bombing of computer-generated one hundred pound penalties for the merest reporting mistake, misunderstanding or even actual fault - that is what is iniquitous, the more so when HMRC can be so lax, so unconcerned and so untouchable when failing its own responsibilities to taxpayers.

I should have probably added, as I do agree with you Andy and Tim, that the penalties are not proportionate and carpet bombing is a huge mistake! 

 



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About