The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Is this legal?


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Is this legal?
Permalink Closed


I have been asked if this can be done, I'm not sure if it can. Whilst I dont think it's illegal, I also don't think its within the spirit of the law.

 

A VAT registered business trading in products, orders items and claims the tax back then sells them at a reduced price including VAT to a none VAT registered business which they also own, so the none VAT registered business can make more profit on the items.

Im not sure about this so have delayed for doing done research into this. 

Surely they can't do this?

 

 



__________________

Kind Regards

 

Eilef Loken MIAB

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well done for spotting it.

It is illegal as they are effectively reclaiming VAT where the purchase was not for them but for a related business.

Effectively company A (VAT registered) is buying goods for related company B (non VAT registered) in which instance company A is not able to reclaim VAT (although they "mistakenly"(!) already have done in the belief that they can reclaim all VAT that they have suffered).

You sometimes also see this with VAT registered companies paying the bills of non VAT registered members of the same group in the mistaken belief that they are able to reclaim the VAT.

You would actually become part of the fraud if you filed in the VAT return of company A.

For further detail refer to sections 25 and 26 of the VAT act.

Also, in the group accounts any unrealised profit in inventory would need to be reversed.

Also, the profit on the back of a fraud, I assume is in order to secure financing for company B. This would result in the directors (and possibly the accountants) being chased for damages by the financial institution involved and as this is an intentional fraud there would be no veil of incorporation to hide behind (the directors would be personally liable).

I would advise the firm concerned to seek the advice of their accountant and if it was their accountant who advised this approach then I would advise them to seek a second opinion from a different one.

kindest regards,

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About