The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Sole trader motor expenses


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 343
Date:
Sole trader motor expenses
Permalink Closed


I have a client who has a cleaning business. They use their own car to travel from clean to clean. Is it ok to claim the mileage for the journeys?



__________________

Sam



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sure is

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 343
Date:
Permalink Closed

But not for any Tax, insurance etc as I understand it?

__________________

Sam



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well can use either the 45p method, claiming nothing else, aside from HP if relevant, or claim actual costs of running the car - insurance maintenance etc. USUALLY it is better to the claim the 45p upto 10000 miles, 25p >10000 miles.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 343
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yes I agree, the keep trying to claim both so just wanted to clear it up one last time, thanks

__________________

Sam



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

No problem. You can put everything through the books, to keep an eye on cash flow etc, yet you'd have to remember to add it all back when calculating SA.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

One thing to watch for Sammy

If they have previously claimed actual costs rather than the mileage they can't then switch to the mileage scheme with the same vehicle.  If they change the vehicle they decide which option is best and stick to it.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Good point well made

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

abacus12345 wrote:

You can put everything through the books, to keep an eye on cash flow etc, yet you'd have to remember to add it all back when calculating SA.


Hi Johnny,

I don't agree with that.

For things like depreciation that need to be added back as you are applying an accounting standard requirement.

For entertaining clients its actually a legitimate expense that is simply not allowable for tax purposes.

The case here though is surely ignoring the requirement that the books show a true and fair view of an entities affairs as one is effectively including the same expenditure twice. First as compensation to the business owner by was of mileage allowance and then by way of the actual expenditure being included.

Its not simply a matter of adding back as part of the self assessment calculation as the financial statements would be incorrect with motoring expenses overstated.

I stand to me corrected but to me the suggested treatment seems incorrect.

 

 



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi, So if you've expenses paid from the bank, what are you reconciling against if the opposite entry is not in the books?

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

CAn I clarify Shaun that you believe the correct treatment should be eg

 

Fuel  2500

RFL  140

Insurance  600

Repairs 360

Total Expenses . Motor Expense £3600

on the accounts 

 

then when doing the SA it should be Motor Expenses eg 4500

which represents 10000 miles at 45p?

 

I've no set opinion on this but I've always calculated the actual cost to the business, which is £4500

The way I see it is that the fuel RFL and insurance etc are of no consequence to the business, as these are the owners own costs in running the vehicle.  If these costs have been paid by the business I record them, calculate the difference and add it to Motor expenses.

I'm not saying I'm right btw so I'm interested in the ensuing debate smile



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

abacus12345 wrote:

Hi, So if you've expenses paid from the bank, what are you reconciling against if the opposite entry is not in the books?


Not from the business bank account!

If the person is claiming mileage then they pay motoring expenses privately.

If money is taken from the business bank then it is drawings.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:

CAn I clarify Shaun that you believe the correct treatment should be eg

 

Fuel  2500

RFL  140

Insurance  600

Repairs 360

Total Expenses . Motor Expense £3600

on the accounts 

 

then when doing the SA it should be Motor Expenses eg 4500

which represents 10000 miles at 45p?

 

I've no set opinion on this but I've always calculated the actual cost to the business, which is £4500

The way I see it is that the fuel RFL and insurance etc are of no consequence to the business, as these are the owners own costs in running the vehicle.  If these costs have been paid by the business I record them, calculate the difference and add it to Motor expenses.

I'm not saying I'm right btw so I'm interested in the ensuing debate smile


Hi John,

The only motoring expenses that I allow through the books that are not mileage (where the client is using mileage rates... Which in my case is all of them) are tolls and parking charges (neither of which are covered by the mileage allowance so are allowable).

If clients put (say) petrol on the company charge card that goes straight to drawings.

When balancing the books the mileage is taken to the capital account which in your example would balance off against what I had thown out to drawings.

At no stage is the integrity of the financial statements compromised.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Shaun 

Sorry I completely misunderstood your reply to Johnny

Slightly different treatment between us but the end result is the same. Motor expenses would still show £4500

(I don't disagree with your way though)

 

 



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

John we had this conversation before on one of your posts, well not exactly a conversation, plus if was for a director, yet... Tell me what is wrong with my method and performing a journal for the difference? If business bank is used also, makes sense.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:

Hi Shaun 

Sorry I completely misunderstood your reply to Johnny

Slightly different treatment between us but the end result is the same. Motor expenses would still show £4500

(I don't disagree with your way though)

 

 


Yes, either of our approaches work John.

My disagreement is what I believe that I am reading with Johnny where the figures are adjusted out in the SA calculation but the actual financial statements would surely be incorrect as certain motoring expenses would be included twice as both the actual cost and included within the mileage payment.

 

 

 

 



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

abacus12345 wrote:

John we had this conversation before on one of your posts, well not exactly a conversation, plus if was for a director, yet... Tell me what is wrong with my method and performing a journal for the difference? If business bank is used also, makes sense.


Ah, this may be one of those cases where what you wrote originally wasn't actually what you meant (sometimes I read back some of my own posts and think "thats not what I was trying to say at all!").

The key burried in there is that you are journaling the difference.

The original post read that you were treating it in a similar manner to depreciation in that it is something removed from the SA calculation rather than something that would need fixing in the accounts before getting to the SA calculation.

This is probably just one of those cases of a matter being lost in translation between what we mean and what we say.

The reality is, from what I am reading, that your method is closer to Johns approach (both mine and Johns give the same result but in different ways).

I note with John's that only either the actual expenses or the mileage will be present in the accounts at any time. Similarly with my approach the figures are automatically adjusted, at no stage is any figure double counted. The difference is that I do not need to apply a period end adjustment to replace the actual figures with the mileage. However, both of these appraoches are completely correct and at no stage is anything double counted in the accounts.

The only slight remaining worry with your approach as I am reading it Johnny is that if you include all of the figures throughout the year rather than just one of the two alternatives, then throughout the period they will be double counted (but I now believe fixed before issue).

I can actually see your cashflow arguement in that it shows how much money has gone out of the business, however, it misses that the process is flawed and the same money is being accounted for twice at both cost and within the mileage payment.

 

 



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

It's one of those - I know what I ment!! Lol.

In fairness the idea behind the method of using the business account is, it keeps things nice and tidy.

 

Admittedly if using the mileage rate, almost everything else it private use.

The method I use stems from, aside from the above - if the client voluntarily registers for VAT (as an oppose to reaching the threshold, as for SE mileage rate can't be used as we know) there may be grounds for a claim on input VAT, for recent services paid for - thus keeping everything in the business account helps if there is an inspection / investigation.

 

I know with bookkeeping a lot can be semantics, where one person will post x and y, another will post it differently - to post twice, would be silly.

 

Then going back to my VAT point, is it better to always ask for a VAT invoice in future just incase it can be reclaimed (for many example, not just motoring) upon registration? Thanks



-- Edited by abacus12345 on Thursday 14th of April 2016 05:52:35 PM

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

abacus12345 wrote:

John we had this conversation before on one of your posts, well not exactly a conversation, plus if was for a director, yet... Tell me what is wrong with my method and performing a journal for the difference? If business bank is used also, makes sense.


 Funnily enough I went back to that thread today because I remembered I'd asked the question before.

You will see that my post to Shaun reflects your method, but I see nothing wrong with Shauns method either.

 

 



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi John,

No it was my own fault, I should have worded what I was trying to say properly.



__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About