The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Sub-contractor being paid by the client


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Sub-contractor being paid by the client
Permalink Closed


Hi  Folks

How usual is it for Sub-contractors to take payments from the client then pay it to the Contractor?  Got my first Sub-contractor and theres a lot of transactions that would inflate the income.  I thought these were going to be quite 'clear' accounts from the original conversation we had hmm I've just put the payments to the Contractor as drawings.



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

 

Hi Janet

Who is the client? Is it a homeowner who would not deduct tax or is it another contractor within the CIS?



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Doug

The client is the homeowner.

I expected the client payments to be dealt with by the Contractor.



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Kinbuck wrote:

Hi Doug

The client is the homeowner.

I expected the client payments to be dealt with by the Contractor.


 I agree, but in my opinion the subbie now becomes the contractor and vice versa so any payments now made by your client (the subbie) to the contractor would now fall under CIS which would mean verifying them and deducting the correct amount of tax depending on their status before any payments could be made



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Artois wrote:

 I agree, but in my opinion the subbie now becomes the contractor and vice versa so any payments now made by your client (the subbie) to the contractor would now fall under CIS which would mean verifying them and deducting the correct amount of tax depending on their status before any payments could be made


Sorry Doug, don't think I've explained this properly.

Subbie sent to job, completes Contractor's job sheet/invoice at the rates set by them; client pays him the cash as the representative of the Contractor.    He pays it into his account and transfers it to the Contractor's accounts.  At the end of the month the subbie invoices Contractor for all of his time/parts used and they pay him, minus the tax due.

(Some clients ring the company up and pay by card - I like these people smile)

 



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

So why not just put the cash straight into the contractors account?

__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Artois wrote:

So why not just put the cash straight into the contractors account?


I'll put that on my list of questions.  

Thanks



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

I Janet
Few things jump out, probably not all but just off the top of my head for now

-Is it just cash payments? (MLR either way)
-If the rates are set by the contractor, he is sent to the workplace by the contractor and now accepting payment as the contractor's representative then he is an employee. IR35 screaming here!
-No he should not be accepting payment. At all (in my view). All sorts of complications, including inflating turnover. Contractual as well as if one or the other decides not to pay their bill, or dispute work blur blur blur.
- Audit/paper trail.
- What happens if the end client tells the contractor they have paid the subbie - and they havent!
- CIS - sounds like its needed (albeit issues as above need clarifying)
- Never ever believe a client when they say its easy/straightforward/clear or words of that nature. Usually the easy ones never make a remark, the difficult ones always embellish how straightforward it is.


If you have put the payments to the contractor to drawings, are you doing the same with the payments in from the end user?






__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheshire wrote:

I Janet
Few things jump out, probably not all but just off the top of my head for now

-Is it just cash payments? (MLR either way)
-If the rates are set by the contractor, he is sent to the workplace by the contractor and now accepting payment as the contractor's representative then he is an employee. IR35 screaming here!
-No he should not be accepting payment. At all (in my view). All sorts of complications, including inflating turnover. Contractual as well as if one or the other decides not to pay their bill, or dispute work blur blur blur.
- Audit/paper trail.
- What happens if the end client tells the contractor they have paid the subbie - and they havent!
- CIS - sounds like its needed (albeit issues as above need clarifying)
- Never ever believe a client when they say its easy/straightforward/clear or words of that nature. Usually the easy ones never make a remark, the difficult ones always embellish how straightforward it is.


If you have put the payments to the contractor to drawings, are you doing the same with the payments in from the end user?


Thanks for the reply Joanne

From the paperwork I have it's only cash and I'm not sure how he would fair if they said they'd paid but hadn't.  Didn't think about the MLR implication either!

I haven't done the income yet.  I stopped working on them until I could get it straight in my head

I'll take all this on board and look in to it more so I'm fully prepared when I speak to him.

Think I need to become a bit more cynical  disbelief no

I'm off to find the gin...



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

I would say it is not usual at all. I've never known this scenario and as Joanne says it opens a whole can of worms. if the cash is going into the subbies account and he is then paying the contractor then it has to come under CIS, the subbie becomes the contractor and vice versa.

I can possibly think of the odd subbie (the MD of a firm who does specialist works for my company for example and who we have had a working relationship with for years ) who may accept cash on our behalf from a client if the client wanted to pay cash (rare) but he would bring it straight round to our offices for us to pay into our company bank account.



__________________

Julie



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Julie

Thanks for your reply. I'm seeing the client next week, hopefully, and will have a good chat with him about how things are being carried out, explain a few things to him. It's a big company he's working with so it all seems a odd that they're not sticking to the rules...I'm still very 'green round the gills'!!

I'll update you all once I've seen him.

Cheers



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'd only just started working for my company (as medium sized construction firm) when I had to tell the financial department of an NHS trust we were subbing for that they had the new CIS completely wrong (it was just after the old card system became obsolete and they were insisting our MD visited their offices with his card that didn't exist any longer rather than receive the details needed for verification).

So bigger doesn't always mean they do it right!

__________________

Julie



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

If its smells fishy - run a mile. Suspect dodgy - report it. Just because its a big company doesnt mean they do things right - there are a few HUGE companies that have been in the press for their dodgy doings.

If you havent been invovled in CIS - run! Or at the very least check out your PII covers you with your skillset. Its a complex area as the guys say.

Have to say, even though I dealt with a few, I tend to avoid nowadays, just because of the hassle that generally comes with them. My cant be ar*ed gene kicks in


__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheshire wrote:

If its smells fishy - run a mile. Suspect dodgy - report it. Just because its a big company doesnt mean they do things right - there are a few HUGE companies that have been in the press for their dodgy doings.

If you havent been invovled in CIS - run! Or at the very least check out your PII covers you with your skillset. Its a complex area as the guys say.

Have to say, even though I dealt with a few, I tend to avoid nowadays, just because of the hassle that generally comes with them. My cant be ar*ed gene kicks in


 I'll get my running shoes Joanne sprint.gif

It's all complex...



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Innit weird, I don't mind CIS at all.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Artois wrote:

So why not just put the cash straight into the contractors account?


 Update on this one...

He is supposed to pay it direct to the contractors account but didn't receive a payment book at the outset.  He said it was easier for him to pay them out of his account as he can't always get to the bank to pay the money in, in the required timescale.  Don't think the contractor chased him at first about how it was happening.  Things been sorted now.

Thanks everyone for your help.



__________________

Janet

They keep making the system idiot proof but then make bigger and better idiots!

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About