The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: IR35 and P11D


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
IR35 and P11D
Permalink Closed


A couple of questions, I am hoping some one can guide me on.

The first is, if a director has no expenses to declare on a P11d, is it necessary to submitted a null return or just say none are due on the P35.

The second question is the definition of a service company. I have read and reread the HMRC blurb and cannot get my head round it.

I get the impression that it is more to do with agency type supplies, where a third party has service contracts supplied by a second party. Then I read that if a director provides the service and has more than a 5% interest in the business, it could be classed as a service business for IR35 purposes.

The way I understand it, in a nutshell is,  basically if a business supplies exclusively to another business, services, then it falls into that category. If it supplies trade services un exclusively it does not.

Looking forward to a reply

Bill

__________________

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 771
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Bill

Sorry I can't help for your service company question.

I normally just state that no P11d's are due on the P35 if there isn't anything to be declared on one.

Regards

Mark

__________________

M & G Associates

Website www.mgassociates-accountancy-services.co.uk/

Accountancy Services Plymouth, Bookkeeping Payroll Sage Training

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheers Mark

That's what I thought but in the case of a director I just had a nagging doubt about it.

Have you managed to get authorised for SA yet?

Bill

__________________

 

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Bill.

1) No expenses, no P11D.

2) It all comes down to control and whether if the company were not there would the relationship between the parties be deemed as employment.

Deemed employment takes into account such thinks as length of the contract, is there any personal financial risk, is there entitlement to paid holidays, whether the contractor is told how to do the work (not just what needs to be done), does the contractor use the clients equipment, does the contractor use their own equipment and materials.

There are loads of tests for deemed employment and the above examples are by no means exhaustive.

Careful with IR35 as the revenue have sneakily and quietly changed the wording so that IR35 may be applicable to some work done by a company even if not all of it. So it's actually based on relevant engagements rather than all the work that the company does.

Don't forget that even if a company is caught by IR35 5% of gross turnover from the relevant engagements is allowable as a flat rate deduction to cover overheads such as training, books and accountancy fees.

Legitimate expenses allowable are the mileage allowance, accommodation, pension contributions and employers NI contributions. Basically everything that you can get if you were an employee. Everything else is deemed salary.

I can't find the actual definition anywhere (which is strange as it used to be everywhere!) but have a look at this link which is quite useful http://www.contracteye.co.uk/ir35.shtml

Hope that some of the above helps answer your questions Bill.

Talk in a bit,

Shaun.



-- Edited by Shamus on Wednesday 21st of April 2010 01:31:51 PM

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 771
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Bill

Just waiting for the online authorisation code code to come through now, which should be here by the end of the week.

Mark

__________________

M & G Associates

Website www.mgassociates-accountancy-services.co.uk/

Accountancy Services Plymouth, Bookkeeping Payroll Sage Training

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheers Shaun

That makes IR35 much clearer

Mark, I had a minor hiccup with my SA authorisation code when it came through (said I was already registered!!) but entered it again and am now a fully fledged SA agent

Bill

__________________

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 771
Date:
Permalink Closed

Congratulations Bill

__________________

M & G Associates

Website www.mgassociates-accountancy-services.co.uk/

Accountancy Services Plymouth, Bookkeeping Payroll Sage Training

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Just one more service that I offer matey.

Come the glorious day the next government (wishful thinking) have promised to repeal IR35 as it's against everything that they stand for. Basically people trying to do there best to better there own lot rather than dependency upon an intrusive nanny state.

When first devised, the consultation committee that advised number 10 included representatives from the management consultancy firms and Indian software houses... Basically a whose who of people who would benefit from crippling one man band IT businesses.

Nobody who represented IT contractors was allowed to attend the initial meetings.

The rules assume that the contractor would be an employee and the limited company model is just a tax avoidance mechanism but the reality is that the IT contractors provided a flexible project based workforceand traditionally use the limited company model not because of the tax situation but because that was the only legal form that agencies would deal with.

IR35 combined with the lies about there being insufficient people to do the work in the UK served only to create a situation where UK jobs went wholesale to India and people previously paying £25k plus in tax per annum instead became net benefit recipients.

Multiply that up by a few thousand IT contractors, multiply by the last ten years (there was a valiant fight for a few years) and there's about a billion of our current debt problem.

Personally I refuse to admit that there is any difference between my limited company and the post office... Well, except for size.

I do nothing that is not IR35 compliant . For example, I don't pay myself dividends. But I just refuse to sign up to a two tier system of limited companies.

Just thinking about how in thirteen years this bunch of muppets has totally destroyed small UK businesses really makes my blood boil.

Personally I think that it would not be unfounded for the government that we have to be tried for crimes against the state for what they've done to the UK service industry over the past 13 years.

God help us all if they get in for another five year.... But then again one should never underestimate the power of very stupid people in very large large numbers.

Right back off my soap box again before my head explodes.

Talk in a bit,

Shaun.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

Problem is none of them are any good, basically you have to choose who's the least hopeless.

__________________
Steve


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

agreed.

I go for fundamental principles rather than personalities (but I do think that Boris would make a great PM).

If your in business vote conservative

If you want to live on state handouts vote labour

If you want legalised drugs vote green.

Still haven't worked out what the liberals stand.

I refuse to recognise the BNP at all.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1329
Date:
Permalink Closed

If you want out of the EU vote UKIP

agree with all the rest.

Working with charities who run NHS funded community projects I know I wouldn't ring fence the NHS from cuts, it's amazing what is funded in the name of health.

Problem is Shaun that during the last 13 years Bliar and Broon have created thousands more public sector jobs and funded a very very generous welfare benefits system - these sheeple will vote labour.  It's a cunning plan to turn everyone into receipients of benefits or work for the state then labour will be in power for ever.disbeliefdisbelief

__________________

Advice from beyond the grave!!!

E&OE



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

Agree with both of you there, benefits need hacking to pieces by someone and the public sector needs one hell of a tidy up. Don't get me started on the NHS.

I'll take your Boris Shaun and raise you Jeremy Clarkson or even better Stephen Fry biggrin


__________________
Steve


Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Morning Steve,

lol.

Well that's obviously Jeremy for Foreign Minister... Think that we would be at war with France within the week... One good way for a single European Union I suppose! We invade them!!!

Boris for the top job

We'll have Lord Digby Jones (or me!) for Chancellor

Stephen Fry to overhaul the benefits system.

And Gene Hunt in charge of law and order.

Anyone got any ideas for health, education and immigration?

Sorted... Now lets fire up the Quatro and get to it.

Right, off to the school run for me.

Talk later,

Shaun.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Sheila,

UKIP. Sorry, forgot that one in my list.

Brussels would have us all believe that once your in then there's no getting out but it's a little publicised fact that Greenland did actually leave the EU.

Fact is that geographically it's more alligned to the states anyway so maybe it was a mistake them ever being part of the EU but the fact remains that they escaped and if they can do it so can we.

Don't get me wrong, nothing against Europe and the common market was a good thing. But when it comes to another country telling me what I can and cannot do then that's another matter. A lot of people have died to give us the freedoms that we now have and it's not for a government elected by us to give away our freedom without even asking us.

And besides that, it does seem that a disproportionate number of the positions of power in Westminster are held by Scots and as Scotland wants their own freedom how can they get away with trying to give away ours.

That's nothing against Scotland by the way, just about the situation in Westminster.

Right, onto the second part of the rely. Public sector jobs.

Agree again. Why should my council tax keep going up whilst wages are falling in order to maintain public sector pensions!

I think that the public sector is in for a big wake up call if there's a change of government. There is already talk about privatisation of the holiest of holy (PAYE) so that pretty means that no department is beyond being dragged kicking and screaming into commercial reality.

So, have to agree that if your unemployed or work in the public sector then voting for change would be like turkeys voting for Christmas.

Ah, I see the last thirteen years cunning plan, if the only people with work are the ones paying out unemployment benefit then everyone will vote labour! The flaw to that of course is where does the money come from to pay unemployment benefit. Oh I know, we borrow it.

Can you imagine going to the bank and asking for a loan based on no income.

Hope that your having a good day Sheila,

Talk later,

Shaun.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

What was IR35 again?

By the way agree with you all. Boris is brill and and Jeremy Clarkson for joint foreign minister and transport minister

Nick Clegg is for a federal states of europe. (I'm with Greenland)

Bill



__________________

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About