The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Sage Bank Accounts


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Sage Bank Accounts
Permalink Closed


Hello, i've been informed that, for ease of use, Sage allows a new bank account to be created using 3*** nominal. This then can be used to make personal payments for sole trader. In effect CR Capital Introduced DR Expense

I've never heard of this way and was wondering if the more experienced had any views on it?
 thanks

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 94
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have never heard of it - is it in a new version of Sage. I have nominal accounts set up in Sage in the 3100 range for capital introduced into the business by the owner and Owners withdrawals.

Sue

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

It certainly makes sense and make things easier if the owner makes a lot of transaction out of (or into) their own pocket. The only danger is the confusion that, if an owner pays for something and you use that account it will be a credit balance, even though he is effectively putting money in. (remembering that capital introduced is a credit)

I have just created a dummy account in Sage V14 no problem. just need to remember to make sure it appears in the CoA and in the right group.

I personally use VT+ and it has a facility to make custom payment accounts and points it to the right ledger and account. This is similar to what is done in Sage

Bill

__________________

 

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have tried it as a dummy too and it certainly would make things easier. How would it handle the repayment to himself from the business bank. Obviously a bank transfer would work but how would it show in drawings?

thanks

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 280
Date:
Permalink Closed

hmmm good idea I suppose if they have personally paid for items where the invoice is in the purchase ledge.

__________________
www.merlionabs.co.uk
info@merlionabs.co.uk


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've now been using it this way for an assignment and its working really well. I just cant get my head around when the sole trader reimburses himself. A bank transfer between business bank and new 3*** account would work geat - but how could i get this to also show in drawings??

-- Edited by NewStar on Thursday 14th of October 2010 10:34:18 PM

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Date:
Permalink Closed

not gonna. you get your reimbursement from the bank account or cash, not from personal a/c .it can work on paper,where you can see the debits,add them up and you would know it is drawings but I can't see it working in sage.

-- Edited by attilabenko on Friday 15th of October 2010 12:19:13 AM

__________________

Attila



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 9
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yes thats what i thought.

But maybe a straight bank payment to Drawings would work. On the B/S the sole trader would only have to take the drawings figure away from the capital introduced figure to see how much the company still 'owed' him?

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Date:
Permalink Closed

And the net profit or loss.
I think there is two different scenarios:

1. Sole trader makes lot of payments from own pocket but every time reimburse himself with the same amount.
This I would not treat as capital introduced and drawings, I would do either just cash/petty cash payment ignoring he put the money in and took it out straight away or maybe I would set him up as a supplier.

2 he makes lot of payments out of own pocket but just occasionally reimburse himself and maybe even for different amounts.
This would be the case of capital introduced and drawings. If you create an account for the extra capital introduced (call it bank account if you want) this can work but only for money put in the business. Drawings still should come out from bank/cash and should be shown as drawings on balance sheet unless he is withdrawing capital. Normally he would do drawings from profit made and the capital would be untouched.

I think one of the advantages of computerised accounts is that you can produce things like TB,BS, P&L etc with the click of a button but for this to give you accurate results things have to be set up properly.
What you say above is ok legally as the result is the same and sole trader would have to pay taxes any way you go - as long as you show drawings and profits, that's why there is no tax included in sole trader accounts, but I don't think it would give you a true and fair view of the accounts what is again probably not even a legal requirement with sole traders but it is a requirement in terms of accounting.

That's just my early morning opinion before a cup of coffee :)

__________________

Attila



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

I find it easier to use the net figure from the account. For convienience I do a month end payment from the owners bank account to the appropriate Drawing or Capital account depending on the balance in the bank account, so if there is a credit balance, i would debit the owner bank a/c and cr capital. If its a debit balance, credit owners bank a/c and debit Drawings. Each month there is a nil balance to start

I usually do this on a month basis for anaylsis but it can be done at year end with just the net amount to adjust Drawings or Capital

Bill



__________________

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 595
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Bill,

Agree that is a good way to do it. My concern with the creating bank account in 3xxx that payments to the owner would not show as drawings and you still would need to either journal figures or make payments from bank to drawing and from here there is not much difference in what range you are creating this account (you still will have to adjust it periodically)
Having an account as it has been described at the beginninng of topic would be really good if everything would be automatic on it and would not need adjustments, otherwise I don't think it is a new way it is just a version of what everybody is doing now...

__________________

Attila



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2256
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Attila

Valid points.



__________________

 

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 882
Date:
Permalink Closed

What is wrong with doing it the old way? If you are reconciling the bank, then any payments made not for business would be posted to the drawings account directly. The bank rec would be as normal. I see that creating a new code etc is more work. IMHO anyway.

P

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About