The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Retrospective Aged Debt Reporting


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Retrospective Aged Debt Reporting
Permalink Closed


Hi All

I do software work for a few companies, much of which is maintaining their accounting systems. Recently, the banks have started breathing down my customer's necks wanting regular aged debt reports. The problem is that they also want them to 'square' with the trial balance (i.e. aged debt analysis bottom lines should equal debtors/creditors balance in balance sheet).

My question is, are there bookeeping packages which handle this properly ? i.e. Where you can print aged debt reports from 9, 6 and 3 months ago which correctly show the aged analysis at that time and who's bottom line agrees with the period trial balance ?

(The aged debt report has to show the aged balances and also the unallocated cash at that time to reconcile the aged balances with the trial balance).

Thanks

Peter


-- Edited by indigopete on Saturday 5th of March 2011 04:45:54 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 426
Date:
Permalink Closed

Dare I say SAGE
Retrospective is pretty straight forward - customer / reports / aged debtors - enter the date required to and tick the box exclude later payments.


__________________

 

Donna Curling - Complete Book-Keeping Ltd (CBKLtd) - 07939 101900

Payroll & bookkeeping solutions - info@completebookkeeping.co.uk

www.completebookkeeping.co.uk

IAB Training centre - Ringwood

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Donna

Thanks for the reply. Yes, I noticed that Sage 200 has a 'retrospective' option, however it doesn't really do the job because it can't cope with staggered allocation / payment dates (as far as I understand).

This is exactly the problem I'm looking to solve (it's the usual reason why aged debt reporting doesn't agree with the trial balance). To reconcile the balances, a credit needs to *not* show up if it is dated  outside the report period, even if it is allocated inside the report period. Conversely, if it is allocated retrospectively - e.g. a January receipt that was allocated in Febuary, this *does* need to show up on the January ageing report as 'unallocated' cash and in the February one as 'Allocated'.

Peter


-- Edited by indigopete on Saturday 5th of March 2011 06:06:34 PM

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 426
Date:
Permalink Closed

you mean a report that has will deal with part allocated invoice's or similar? There is one but will have to come back as I think it is an add on, but definately there is one.



__________________

 

Donna Curling - Complete Book-Keeping Ltd (CBKLtd) - 07939 101900

Payroll & bookkeeping solutions - info@completebookkeeping.co.uk

www.completebookkeeping.co.uk

IAB Training centre - Ringwood

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yes - that type of thing.

For example:

Transaction History:

Jan Invoice - £1000
Feb Receipt £600 (Nothing allocated)
Mar Allocation £600 (January's unallocated residual)
Mar Receipt £400 (Not allocated)

Reports Printed in May:

Jan Retrospective: Outstanding Debt = £1000, Balance (TB) = £1000
Feb Retrospective: Outstanding Debt = £400, Balance (TB)= £400
Mar Retrospective: Outstanding Debt = £400, Unallocated Cash = £400, Balance (TB)= Nil


__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 518
Date:
Permalink Closed

This is a basic requirement and most systems should be able to produce this. The theory is simple you have a date of invoice and a date of payment.

The debt report equaling the tb is a common control test, particularly when auditing.

Sage does it, as does Kashflow.

__________________

Phil Hendy, The Accountancy Mentor

Are you thinking of setting up your own practice or have you set up and need some help?

If so a mentor may be the way forward - feel free to get in touch and see how I can assist you. 

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Permalink Closed

HendyPhilhendy wrote:

This is a basic requirement and most systems should be able to produce this.

 

Hello Phil

Yes, your right ! - after reading your post and Donna's I tried this in Sage 50 and sure enough it excludes the future payments, even if they are partial. The reason I was'nt sure about this the first place was because I read this article which made a distinction between the receipt date and the allocation date, going on to state that the aged debt and TB balances could potentially disagree . . . . http://www.gccinnova.co.uk/BlogDetails.aspx?id=3&entryid=5

However in trying it in Line 50 I couldn't reproduce the 'disagree' scenario outlined in the Sage 200 article.

Regards

Peter



__________________
gbm


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 896
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Peter,

When reading this thread, the thought which crossed my mind was 'why would you want to print an aged debtors report out from 3, 6 or 9 months ago?'

Surely if the banks want it, figures from the summer are pretty much meaningless now.

__________________

 

Regards,
Nick

Website: www.gbmaccounts.co.uk
Twitter

Factsheet | Starting a Business

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Permalink Closed

gbm wrote:

'why would you want to print an aged debtors report out from 3, 6 or 9 months ago?'


Good question :)

As background, I am a software developer and have written some accounting modules over the last 20 years as a part of wider business automation systems. When I started out, the main purpose of an aged debt report was to support the credit control processes within the business.

Now I'm finding that the banks are taking a greater involvement in the day to day financial activities of it's customers (who are also my customers). I assume they use (for example) aged debt reports to 'rate' the quality of the current assets (e.g a business with a large trade debtors balance consisting of old debts is not as good as one where everything is in the current or 30 day column and very little in the 60-90 column). I think they look at the pattern over, say a year, to asses how tight the business's cashflow is etc.

That's just my assumption, but I know that they press me for certain reports and that much of that pressure is in turn coming from the banks as opposed to internal management requirements.

Peter



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 426
Date:
Permalink Closed

I have often been left printing out reports many months after year end as most customers are slow and forwarding credit card and petty cash (despite chasing and pointing out the importance to re-claim the VAT).

There are additional reports for sage and one download are is reconciling reports. I will try and find the actual details but I have personally had to use this in the past as debtors/credits has not matched TB. It was due to future allocated payments against an invoice.

__________________

 

Donna Curling - Complete Book-Keeping Ltd (CBKLtd) - 07939 101900

Payroll & bookkeeping solutions - info@completebookkeeping.co.uk

www.completebookkeeping.co.uk

IAB Training centre - Ringwood

 



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Permalink Closed

Donna CBK wrote:

It was due to future allocated payments against an invoice.

 

When I tried this in Line 50 it seemed ok. The future allocated payments were excluded from the aged debt balance (although displayed) and the aged debt therefore agreed with the retrospective Balance Sheet that I printed for comparison (which I assumed is showing the TB figure).

How come your future allocations put your TB out ?

Peter

 

 



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 426
Date:
Permalink Closed

No idea, Im going back around 6 months or so I just remember it happened. If I ran a TB including all transactions (incl future) and a Aged debtors (or creditors) including all payments & future entries it worked.
It may have been other way around. Payment in 1 lump sum with allocated invoice's after month end.

no idea - I dont remember yesterday often - but I certainly had the problem and Sage advised me of the additional reports if you have extra cover.

__________________

 

Donna Curling - Complete Book-Keeping Ltd (CBKLtd) - 07939 101900

Payroll & bookkeeping solutions - info@completebookkeeping.co.uk

www.completebookkeeping.co.uk

IAB Training centre - Ringwood

 



Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi I'm wondering if a solution to this issue was found, Pete? I'm having the same issue in Sage 200 and Sage have designed some reports for me to view transactions with a future allocation date but my trial balance still doesn't match the aged reports.



__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

i Carina
Think you will find that Pete hasnt logged on since about 2012. In fact ive not seen Donna around for a while neither. Might be worth re-posting on a new thread - I would suggest you speak to Ian at Onion reporting who posts on here.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About