the mr X case was quite different in that for that one you were advising a client on their legal form which a dangerously litigeous area to go anywhere near.
In this case of a VAT registered limited company that is already trading I would not have had reservations about advising you to chase that one.
The two scenario's are very much chalk & cheese in this instance.
Good luck with eventually turning them into clients.
Right, now let me think about the part of the message that everyone else has picked up on.
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
I don't consider myself at all prudish but piercings and earrings are not something that I would expect to see on anyone working for me.
But then again, such is no worse than brown shoes with a dark suit... Or for that matter doing business not wearing a dark coloured suit.
On the other hand, in industry you will see the odd person wandering around the headquarters of major corporations in slacks, T shirt with piercings and you know that these people are technical demi gods who can pretty much do as they like... You would never let clients see them but how they dress is no reflection on their position or payscale in the company.
I think that the best way to think of the scenario is to put yourself in the seat of the client and try to see yourself through their eye's. Or even, is there anything about your dress that you would find wrong if it was on an MP or a bank manager?
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
After last weeks "day-job" interferance with my highly important schedule, the blog is back, and just in time to celebrate 6 months of typing until my fingers bleed - all for your entertainment.
Oh dear, is it too bad to mention that I've looked at your posts 3189 time... lol.
Love the being contentious about which supervisory body off site... no... won't... bite....
Mr's S has the right idea. Never buy anything (or even take anything free) when you can get Excel to do it for you as you control the software rather than the other way around.
Excellent news about the potential client. Consider the combined readership of the site all sitting with their fingers crossed for you through the entirety of the next week until we get our next blog fix.
Go pDm, go pDm....
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
You know, I've just spent the last few minutes trying, but it looses a lot in translation. If only I could set it to music and write paragraphs in full technicolor.
All I will say is: Drag Queen, garden party, LOTS of alcopops and an open fire pit - I have this naughty mental image that's a bit too much like a Warner Bros. cartoon, where Droopy sets fire to the Wolf in Bo-Peeps wig!
I shouldn't laugh - but I did.
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
I've been very naughty this week and hardly been on the forum at all. I can see from all the recent posts I've got a lot of reading to catch up on. Another time of year thing? There's always more to learn.
Thank you, Frauke and Fiona for your well wishes - and it's a real pleasure to finally be able to say...
Excellent news pDm.... I would only count it as one though as these things seem to come along in three's so you don't want to waste two on a single fee! lol
all the best,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Really pleased for you. I do hope these things come in 3s - 2 more for you and 1 for me! Hope Twitter works for you, just remember to limit your time spent on it.
I think that applies to many of us for this site as well Sylvia
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Happy Easter everyone! I spent most of yesterday at my desk plotting world domination, today I'm off to visit my mum for her birthday, aww, and the next two days will probably involve chocolate, housework and more work. Gotta love "4 days off", huh?
Sure that you did all of this in basic management accounting but for pricing models look at Ansoff's product / market matrix.
for cost reduction look at the idea's behind Porters Value chain (in itself it's more geared towards manufacturing than service industries).
Also look at Cyert and Marches performance prism.
At the end of the day there are only really two approaches.
- cost leadership
- differentiation
Most bookkeepers just go for cost leadership by undercutting the competition. To my mind this is the wrong approach. Channel don't win market share by offering the cheapest perfume.
To differentiate your services means offering something that others don't. I differentiate my services by being traditional whereas the competition is hell bent on giving the clients what they feel that they need rather than what the client actually wants.
kind regards,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Another weekend of paperwork awaits, but in the meantime, pull up a chair and read about that bloody annoying bloke wot thinks he's abookkeeper, ranting on about his dull and dreary week, again...
I have a fantastic facility on my phone to block sales calls. Obviously you can only do it after the first one is received, but it gives them a great wee message. It says "thank you for calling, unfortunately everyone is busy dealing with other telesales marketers. Your call is being placed in our queuing system and due to the number of telesale's calls we have to deal with your call will probably never be answered. Here's some terrible music while you wait."
You've now got, I pressume one limited company and two self assessments or is the mother also going to be doing that?
To be fair I would also have advised incorporation unless the client had specific reasons for not wishing to go down that route.
Have you learnt exactly what you role will be going forwards? How much exactly has the mother taken? Who files the VAT returns, Who handles the Payroll, Who deals with year end payroll procedures?
You might need to review your engagement letter in light of your changed status with the newly formed entity.
Good luck with the client going forwards,
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
I pretty sure Mrs.P (the mother) will be dealing with all reporting, and VAT hasn't been mentioned at all. One director does his own SA already and the other is her son, so I probably won't be doing his either now. Hence down to 1 client.
I'm still receiving info from her relating to incorporation and other bits and bobs, so for the time being it's all out of my hands. I haven't looked at any of it yet because it all happened whirl-wind like, the latter half of last week.
Now you mention it I will have to re-draft the engagement letter to take account of the changes. That'd slipped my mind, thanks.
You were right, Shaun, should have only put down one client to begin with - looks like I jinxed having three come along all at once, lol ;)
pDm
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Unfortunately there's no blog post today, even though this week has been packed to the rafters with a hell of a lot going on, almost none of it has been related to bookkeeping.
This week in brief:
I have quite unexpectedly been promoted to a new day job. More money, and of course more work.
Completed Tutor Marked Assignments 2 and 3 of IAB,Lv3 without any errors.
Finished reading Module 1 of IAB,Lv4 (tax).
I'm sure you'll forgive me not trying to spin those few morsels of news into a propper blog!
The new day job has certainly taken over my priorities for the moment, and looks like it will need to stay that way until I've got it all figured out and running the way I want it. Bit of a project, you might say.
Should be back to normal with the blog next week *fingers crossed*
Have a great weekend everyone,
pDm
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Maybe time to take stock and put the busines on ice for a while whilst you finish the qualification and get completely on top of the new levels of responsibility in the day job.
Just a suggestion but new responsibilities at work, study and running a business seem to be like tearing yourself in too many different directions at once.
Take this from someone whose been there, done that and have the divorces to prove it.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
ROFL - You're not wrong, Shaun, and thank you! This move is a to completely different department - so a lot to learn and not a lot of time in which to do it. I'd already decided to pull back on the business until the day job settles down again. Of course with distance learning I can "fit that in" whenever I have time.
@ Neil - Dinner? Hadn't you ought to buy me flowers first? :P
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Right, resume the tradition. Just off to make a cuppa and them I'll open that link :)
<< time passes >>
Just finished it. Congratulations on the new client. They always seem to come along when you are least expecting them.
The bit about the job gets a little cut short. Are you now on top of it? Is it secure?
Nice to hear some good news on the site.
all the best,
Shaun.
-- Edited by Shamus on Saturday 30th of June 2012 11:02:54 AM
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
Morning all - I'm baaaaack!
This weeks blog: And then it all went, BANG!
http://thebookkeepersintown.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/and-then-it-all-went-bang/
(doing all this from my phone this week as I'm away from my PC propper - sorry for the rubbish link)
pDm
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Yes, I have to admit I've missed your blog too. I've been very busy over the last 6+ months and its great to see you busy too. Life for you is certainly going the right way and all the ground work you've done over the last 9 months is certainly paying off.
I finally got round to putting up a recommondation page up from students for the tax course! : http://yourlocalbook-keeper.co.uk/course/recommendations-from-students/
I bet you all thought I was going to skip this week, didn't ya?!
Weeeell, you're nearly right, because I almost did. See inside this weeks episode for more details, but publishing by Saturday lunchtime isn't realistic for me anymore...
Your shooting yourself in the foot a little with your rates Michael.
In the current ecconomic climate £15 per hour is a decent rate for ongoing monthly work but for a yearend you need to be thinking of the whole package and your normal rate of £140 is too low for accounts prep. (We'll ignore the £60, that was covered in the post). Its not just your time, it's software, insurance, professional memberships, etc. that all need to be factored into your fee's. (Not to mention factoring in risk and contingency).
Just be careful that you don't end up in a fools paradise of having lots and lots of work due to your rates but turning little if any overall profit.
Also, always remember when quoting mate rates that your time has an opportunity value. If you were not working at one rate for one person you could be working at another rate for someone else. The minimum rate that we should chanrge should always be the maximum rate that we could get for our time.
At the moment of course you can fit clients in where there is no other work to compate such time against but just be careful that your actions are not building a rate expectancy for future periods.
Have a look at some of the debates that feature Bob Harper. Kris and Myself where things such as value pricing / price of perfect information, hourly rates, etc. are covered quite regularly (there's actually been a major breakthrough this week in that with a little adjustment of the description of value pricing combined with a quantified example I find I am currently in agreement with Bob).
Congratulations on the continued expansion of your business.
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
As Shuan (and you are realising) says, you do need to make sure you price things correctly.
You need to learn from your "mistakes". We often see people on this site say that £200 is a lot of money for a simple set of books or paying more than £15ph is a lot (!). These are the amounts I charged over 25 years ago, and after all this time am shocked that people think these rates are expensive (!)
There are only so many hours in a day any person can work. When I was last employed (more than 4 years ago) I used to get paid £18ph, but would only do about 1-2hrs work a day. The rest of the time was taken up doing "other things", which could have been classed as work, but was in fact not particulary hard, technical or "taxing" in the way that I now have to do for my clients. If I was able to work for my own clients in the same way I worked for an employer, it would be reasonable to charge a lower hourly rate than I do, but the reality is working for an employer I was unlike to "burn out" so expect to get paid a lower hourly rate. Working for a client is physically and mentally harder, so I expect to be paid a higher hourly rate. Also of coure the amount I charge has to cover the times I can't work - which of course and employer would pay me.
With an employer I get paid £x per year. If I actually took this amount and divided it by the number of hours I could work (i.e. after removing holidays, training, CPD, sickness and anything I can think off) the hourly rate would really be about £30+ not £18 as I beleived I was being paid. If we price our work against employee rates, we need to also look at the the amount of actual work done - rather than the time only.
Thank you Frauke and Shaun for your comments - duly noted and about to be acted upon. There's a little back-tracking I need to be getting on with now that should help... read on.
Interestingly a business plan is never something I've written for my business. I do have plans, it's just that they live in my head and are very organic. I always thought a written plan was a waste of time because I know I'd have done exactly what you did, wrote it, filed it and ignored it for months.
Just a question to others though, did anyone have a business plan that they feel really helped their business develop?
"BLIMY! Him again. I was wondering what had happened to him?"
Evening all! There's another blog up at Wordpress - I've just done it all from my phone so please follow the link in my signature below.
This weeks blog: Like blood from a stone.
I'm hoping to be a bit more active on the forum in the coming weeks. See you around ;)
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Shaun, I think we're arguing the same point from different angles. I agree with everything you've said above. But if you look at the questions most asked on this forum (What software... , How much should I charge..., Who should I join..., etc.) and the results I'm putting forward, what you have is a numerical representation of those answers in one easy to read format - nothing more. Which where you consider how spread out and convoluted those answers sometime are, might by some, be considered as useful.
Call it an summary of opinions. And thank you for challenging me to clarify - I wouldn't want to appear misleading in anyway.
;0)
-- Edited by pDm on Saturday 6th of October 2012 03:32:54 PM
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
As some one who attempted to join the Royal Statistical Society (failed the first exam for various reasons and gave up), I am fascinated by the mathematical relationships (as real ones don't work out to well for me )
Really bugs me when you see an advert, which is usually (as Shaun said) for a cosmetic product for some reason, that says 98% of woman prefer......., then in a tiny footnote you see the population size was only 103.
That's what gives stats a bad name. That and the fact that word statistics, is derived from state arithmatic, and who trusts government figures??
Edited because I hadn't spotted that Shaun already mentioned the cosmetics companies but there is more than one culprit
-- Edited by Wella on Saturday 6th of October 2012 05:34:20 PM
Hoi-Hoi the forum! Lovely weather we're having... er, no.
I suddenly realised i was in danger of becoming late with something I promised a while back. The results are in and I don't think there are too many surprises, but I know you'll all be interested.
there are still too few replies to make the information useful although it is interesting to see the cross selection even from so small a data population.
Even at this level of input I think that the software useage is about right in that my impression is that about 50% of the market use sage but I feel that in many cases that is because they do not realise that there are viable an even better alternatives.
Time and again I've hit start ups looking at Sage as a must do tick box for their new enterprise and they seem surprised when I question such choice (which is occassionally on the back of "but my bank gave me a copy").
After this weeks Intuit roadshow I do feel that we are about to enter the era of a two horse race and as Quickbooks needs the likes of VT for iXBRL filing (where VT doesn't need QB) I think that we are entering interesting times where the software landscape is about to change (including a change in attitude towards cloud offerings where such are truly integrated with accountants desktop software).
Shaun.
__________________
Shaun
Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.
there are still too few replies to make the information useful...
I have to disagree (slightly). So small a cross section doen't make it entirely accurate - but I did find the information very useful. A more scientifc approach (with crossreferenced answers to each individual) would of course give stronger and more valid results, but that wasn't the intention. It's also why I wanted to show how many people had actually answered to give a context.
For a new start-up even realising where the majority of even such a small group are headed can be very useful indeed! Especially in the results to "Who supervises for MLR?", where the results are too close to call with an almost even split across all the answers. I was also worried that if I asked for any more detail than I did, people wouldn't want to respond and "give too much away" about their businesses.
All I'm saying is - take 'em with a pinch of salt. But use them if you like.
"Useful is in the eye of the beholder."
pDm
__________________
my blog "the bookkeeper's in town - learning the hard way"
Hi PDM, I am the last of the few 'Desktop Only' software users which is neither QB or Sage - spreadsheet for ancillary work. It did also occur to me that people might be covered for AML with say, AIA, so an 'other' box might be useful there.