The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Gym membership


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Gym membership
Permalink Closed


Hi,

 

Can somebody please advise me how you would have to treat the cost of a gym membership paid by the business? Note that the cost of the gym membership also allows free 24 hour parking for the person which allows access to the place of work?

Also, should the gym membership be taken on the business name or the individuals name - bearing in mind it allows access to parking which is used when in office (Note office is located in busy city centre location)

 

Any advice on this issue would be much appreciated.

 

Regards 



__________________

Thanks, Nadia.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi,

the expense is not wholly, necessarily and exclusively for the purpose of the business it having duality of purpose.

HMRC would regard the parking as a side effect rather than cause of the purchase.

Your client should either

(a) seek to gain the parking for the price of the Gym membership and ensure Gym membership is actually excluded from the agreement. Or,

(b) it should go to the DLA.

The only reason that the client would have for not choosing option (a) would be if the gym membership was the reason for the cost in which case they just answered the question for you.

If the parking is not available without the gym membership then you need to look at the price of membership compared to parking. If it around the same for a parking season ticket and gym membership then they client should opt for the parking.

If the gym membership is a lot cheaper then it would be best to contact HMRC and get their permission to take this approach towards this expense. If you explain that their tax take will be greater if they go for the gym option they may be accomodating.

The parking should be taken in the business name.

Gym membership which includes free parking should be in the individuals name unless HMRC agree to the exception in this instance.

That's my take on the scenario but I'm sure that others will have a different view of matters so hold on in there for alternate answers before making a call on this.

Kind regards,

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About