The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: PAYE Scheme required?


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 421
Date:
PAYE Scheme required?
Permalink Closed


Above £102/week you have to operate a PAYE scheme.

Below £102/week the employee/director loses state pension rights.

Furthermore a PAYE scheme allows a director to extract £7200/year from the company entirely free of tax or NI or corporation tax.

So usually it is well worth running a PAYE scheme, and the trivial cost of the scheme is heavily outweighed by the tax advantages.

 

EDIT: And if there is justifiable work for a director's spouse who isn't employed elsewhere (eg doing the accounts, answering the phone, etc) you can extract an additional £7200/year in tax-free pay for the spouse as well. But they do have to be doing something that could justify that payment if an inspector were to query it.



-- Edited by Tom McClelland on Wednesday 25th of January 2012 06:11:08 PM

__________________

Life's a reach, then you gybe

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 421
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've seen both the annual 260ths (based on a 5 day week) and the proportion of worked days in a month used.

Our software supports both methods (and some others, such as 365ths, including weekends) as it happens.

All methods can create bizarre anomalies. The problem with using the working days as a proportion of possible worked days in the month is that it means that the daily rate for days off varies according to the month of the year. Unscrupulous employees can take advantage of this by pulling sickies in months where it doesn't cost them so much to do so. The problem with using 260ths is that in a 31 day month someone who starts a job on Tuesday 2nd of a 31 day month can actually get paid more than someone who worked the entire month!

So no method is perfect. Just pick one and stick to it. (Or better yet get payroll software that supports a method and use that biggrin )



-- Edited by Tom McClelland on Wednesday 25th of January 2012 10:40:39 PM

__________________

Life's a reach, then you gybe

 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink Closed

Good Afternoon,

 

I have a new client [Friend really], [ Limited co, with only a director as the sole employee] the clients Accountant last year set up the client with a PAYE scheme, the accountant then raises monthly payslips for £589, I assume this is to keep the director below the £7072 threshold and thus avoid paying any tax or Ni & avoid company paying any employers contributions, I guess the figure of £589.00 may change in April, with the new thresholds.

 

Anyway, this started me thinking, in this case is it a requirement that a PAYE scheme has to be set-up, for the foreseeable its only ever going to be this one director on the payroll, if his not incurring any tax or NI & no NI for company, is a PAYE scheme really necessary.

 

The Accountant charged £75.00 to set the scheme up and then charges an extra fee each month for processing the payroll.

 

Is it common practice to set-up a PAYE scheme for every limited company, regardless if the director wont be paying any TAX or NI?

 

 

Many Thanks



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 104
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi,

not every LTD company needs to be registered for PAYE. There are different scenarios. You can find guidelines here: http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/paye/intro/register.htm

Hope this helps.

Fabs

__________________

Boomerang Bookkeeping

Fixed-fee Bookkeeping Solutions for Small Businesses from £15 per month.

FIXED FEE BOOKKEEPING  -  PAYROLL MANAGEMENT  -  SELF-ASSESSMENT TAX RETURNS  -  VAT ACCOUNTING



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
Permalink Closed

Also, as well as the director receiving income with no tax or NI, this is allowable as an expense so the company saves CT.

Happy Days!



__________________

Rob Director R & J Business Solutions (www.rjbusinesssolutions.co.uk) @RobRJBS



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks ever so much for the responses, Tom that explanation was just what I was after.

Going slightly off topic from my original question but still along similar lines, well Payroll at least.........

I've just had a client call me asking if there was a standard procedure when processing payroll in how to work out pro rata pay for a mid month employee joining her company?

She has obviously done some delving on the net, and was asking me should it be based on purely the number of days worked that first month or based on number of days in that month, She had me spinning

Employee joined on the 11th Jan, and pay is calculated to the end of Jan [31st], the employees salary is £20k per year and after this first month, her salary will be £1,666.67 p/m ongoing [20,000 /12]

How would others go about calculating the pay for Jan, I keep working it different ways and coming up with different amounts..

She then started asking about calculating holiday pay but think Ill save that scenario for another day, head hurts as it is  !!!

Thanks Again everyone.



__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 206
Date:
Permalink Closed

I personally would pay 1/260 of the annual salary for every day worked in January, so for an employee starting on 11th it would
be £20,000 divided by 260 (52 weeks at 5 days a week), multiplied by 15 (there being 15 working days between 11th January and 31st January.
I'm sure other people will calculate it in different ways, you just need to make a decision and stick to it!

__________________

Eunice Cubbage



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
Permalink Closed

I would work it out based on working days in the month.

Assuming the employee works Monday to Friday, 11th to 31st is 15 working days out of a possible 20 so the gross pay will be £1,666.67 x 15/20 = £1,250.00.

This might be calculated differently depending on the terms of the employment contract but this is how I would work it.

__________________

Rob Director R & J Business Solutions (www.rjbusinesssolutions.co.uk) @RobRJBS



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 113
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks Tom, I was starting to doubt myself for a bit!

A good reason why employment contracts are important

__________________

Rob Director R & J Business Solutions (www.rjbusinesssolutions.co.uk) @RobRJBS

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About