The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Firms who work for firms


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Firms who work for firms
Permalink Closed


Can anyone enlighten me as to how we should account for work carried out by other companies that we engage.

As our business (construction and maintenance) has grown we have decided to have certain works undertaken by other limited companies.

For example we as a small limited co. are awarded a contract by a customer of ours and we engage another ltd co. to carry some of the works for us at a price including all material labour machinery hire etc. We invoice our customer for the whole costs and our supplier invoices us for the whole works they have carried out.

Qu. do we account for the subcontracted work as straight purchases or are there implications or the subcontracted labour element of the works undertaken? We engage individuals under the CIS and have no issues there but what about firms who provide a full service to us.

I hope there is a simple answer!

 

 



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Permalink Closed

The lack of response tells me that I must have phrased this qu poorly.

All I want to know is whether to book these subcontractor invoices to 5000 or 6002 (Sage codes)

Can anyone help?



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1470
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi there,

I put my client's sub-contractors under 6002 if this helps. Although they are not involved in CIS so don't know whether you would deduct 20% when paying them?

Pauline

__________________

Pauline



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks Pauline, I don't know who these suppliers employ hence the qu.

I've tried to rephrase the question as below.

As a small construction firm, (ltd Co.) we employ a no. of individual sole trader subcontractors under the CIS and have no real problems with posting their costs and remitting the PAYE to HMRC etc. I use 6002,2210,2220 nom codes.

Recently we have been awarded some larger contracts and have decided to satisfy these by engaging some 3rd party specialists who are limited co.s who provide a full service (ie not labour only) to carry out certain parts of the contract.
We will invoice our customer and each of these 3rd parties will invoice us for their part including all materials,equip hire and labour etc.
An example might be 1) Our invoice to our customer is for £10000+Vat
2) Supplier A invoices us for £5000.00+Vat say for laying a floor 3) Supplier B invoices us for £2000.00 + Vat for building a wall 4) We use one of our sole traders subcontractors at a cost of £500.00 Gross for digging a trench.
Am I correct in assuming that these Suppliers A and B should be posted up to a Nom Code sitting within the Purchases 5000-6000 Grouping and that there is no need for us to account to HMRC for any of the labour element of their invoiced costs and we treat our "direct" subcontractor as usual? Question

Hope this make my question clearer!

Grahambiggrin



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1470
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Graham,

I would say that you treat these Limited Company sub-contractors the same way as your sole trader sub-contractors.  I haven't dealt a lot with CIS but if these companies are registered under CIS then you need to verify them with HMRC before paying them as you need to know whether they are paid gross or net of tax and I think they have to split their invoices into labour and materials. (But not entirely sure about that).

I would still post them under 6002 sub-contractors as that is what they are.

Maybe someone who knows a little more about the CIS scheme can assist?

See this pdf www.hmrc.gov.uk/forms/cis.340.pdf

Pauline



__________________

Pauline



Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 20
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks for your help Pauline,

I guess the determining factor is whether they really are subcontractors or not. I'll have to scour the HMRC website a bit more diligently.

Graham

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1470
Date:
Permalink Closed

From your description I would have thought that you are the Contractor and they are the subcontractor as you are subcontracting them to do work for you on your contract. Some firms can be contractors and subcontractors just to make it more confusing.

Pauline

__________________

Pauline

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About