The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Salary v Dividend


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Salary v Dividend
Permalink Closed


Why would someone all of a sudden decide to start paying themselves a dividend and stop paying a salary?

What are the benefits?

What are the drawbacks?



__________________

Thanks, Nadia.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:
Permalink Closed

Salary:

Advantages - reduces Corporation Tax Bill;
- can be paid even when the company is making a loss
- could enhance pension contribution allowances

Disadvantages - liable for national insurance contributions
- only available to employees

Dividend:

Advantages - No national insurance liability
- Non-working shareholders are entitled to dividends

Disadvantages - can normally only be paid when the company is making a profit

In reality, the small owner-manager company would give a mixture of salary and dividends to a director/shareholder.

__________________

Your local accountant

 

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

If you pay dividends it's not salary so you pay no Empoyee or (more importantly) Employer national insurance contributions.

The NI is the real reason that the lat Government brought in the IR35 legislation.

Here's a link to this discussion that's come up before on the site :

http://www.book-keepers.org.uk/t45819284/directors-dividend-only-no-salary/

And here's an interesting discussion on the subject on Aweb

http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/dividends-rather-salary

As for all of one, non of the other, remember that salary is an expense where dividends are not (They are a distribution of profits).

Also worth mentioning is that if you don't pay any N.I. then you are not contributing anything towards your state pension which will be reduced / eradicated by the shortfall in contributions.

Most directors who do not fall foul of IR35 legislaion actually pay a combination of salary and dividends

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

snap biggrin



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks guys - very helpful

The reason why I asked this question was becasue I have come across a client who was initally paying themselves a salary (monthly) and a small dividend (ad-hoc basis) - which is what you would expect from a reasonably small company.

However, they have all of a sudden decided that they no longer want to pay themselves a salary - they only want to pay the 'salary' in the form of a dividend on a monthly basis - which to me seems a little strange..... unless I am reading too much into this....?

__________________

Thanks, Nadia.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Permalink Closed

What would happen in the case where the above situation was taking place in a company where there were several partners?

Are there any legal implications regarding this matter?

Are there any implications regarding employment law? e.g. if no longer paid a salary... is there no longer an employment contract.... therefore no longer an employee....?

__________________

Thanks, Nadia.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 205
Date:
Permalink Closed

Normally, what the director would normally do is take a salary that makes full use of their personal allowance and then the director should draw the remainder out in dividends.

Because they are directors of the company, they are classed as office holders and, therefore, they can do work and be for it in that capacity. This is normally unless there is a contract in place which make them workers.

That is why the national minimum wage regulations normally do not apply to directors.



__________________

Your local accountant

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About