The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Rant - Unforgiving Sage


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Rant - Unforgiving Sage
Permalink Closed


I can understand the need to keep transactions for an audit trail and all that. But a simple mistake of using the wrong date and you have to reverse the transaction and then re-post it using the correct date. You can't just edit the journal date - no you have to have "Reverse" transactions. Why?



__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Because Sage think that anyone using their products is an idiot that needs to be protected from themselves?

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Permalink Closed

By having to go through the reverse process it could end up causing more damage than good. Just let me edit the bleeping date.

__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

I'm almost certain they may have made this a feature in the new sage 50, they just need to put it in Instant now as I agree it is very annoying.

__________________
Steve


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2021
Date:
Permalink Closed

I think it was because you could change one half of the journal, and not the other, and it would make a cock up of the whole system. I've always considered it a safety feature

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 513
Date:
Permalink Closed

I agree, it is a pain and i cant see why.

Before i do anything really complicated on Sage i take a back up as i would rather restore it, than faff around unpicking what has gone wrong.



__________________

Nick 

Nick Craggs FMAAT ACA  AAT Distance Learning Manager

@nickcraggs 

BKN Tutor of the Year 2013 & 2015


footer_logo.png



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 426
Date:
Permalink Closed

Sorry don't really have much problem with it, its just another line, you can hide the deleted transactions from company preferences so no need to see them apart from looking at the audit trail

__________________

 

Donna Curling - Complete Book-Keeping Ltd (CBKLtd) - 07939 101900

Payroll & bookkeeping solutions - info@completebookkeeping.co.uk

www.completebookkeeping.co.uk

IAB Training centre - Ringwood

 



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 141
Date:
Permalink Closed

As Michelle said it is because it is in two halves and if you redated one half and not the other then things would be imballanced (within a date) , with every other type of transaction you can edit the date.

__________________

For just about anything Sage :- switch to renting, pay-as-you-go sage support, sagecover, upgrades, application integration, reports, layouts, analysis or any other help making life with sage easier/less time consuming Contact me.

Image



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 115
Date:
Permalink Closed

BruceDenney wrote:

As Michelle said it is because it is in two halves and if you redated one half and not the other then things would be imballanced (within a date) , with every other type of transaction you can edit the date.


As if to illustrate the point, the demo data that came with my Sage Instant 2013 has just such an imbalanced journal!  confuse 

Why they want to demonstrate what not to do beats me.



__________________

Ian

Ian Brown FCA
Onion Reporting Software Ltd

www.onionrs.co.uk

Sage accounts in Excel to go. No set-up necessary.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

There is a journal reversal button at the top of the company screen.

__________________
Steve


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Permalink Closed

And the journal reversal leaves two entries.
Why won't they just let us re-open the original journal like you can do in VT Transaction, change the date and both entries are changed.

__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

True, it would be a lot easier. It appears they have some problems with simplicity, for example, I have a casual employee who works on and off, sage instant payroll now completely cuts him off from RTI if he goes a week unpaid, they have to remotely re-enter him on the RTI submission to get it working again which involves a phone call, I sometimes feel like switching over to another software provider. In short I feel your pain :)

__________________
Steve


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1707
Date:
Permalink Closed

Isn't there an option to put the employee "on hold" until he returns? Under employee status if I remember correctly. Or have things changed?
I know I had employees of a football club "on hold" in Sage 50 Payroll as it wasn't known if they were going to return to the club then on April 5th I made them leavers. If they return they can fill in another starter checklist.

__________________

Never buy black socks from a normal shop. They shaft you every time.

http://www.smbps.co.uk/



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1609
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Peasie

Yes what I did before the update to 2014 was to click a "don't pay this employee" box for the weeks they weren't there, then un-check it for the weeks i was paying them. It could be that they are there for a few weeks then not there for a few weeks, now however because HMRC are no longer interested in the weeks when an employee isn't being paid, they have revamped the software to not include them in the RTI submission for the non paying weeks. Because of some glitch however, when you do pay the employer again they are still omitted from the submission and at the moment they can only get put back on the submission list by Sage themselves going through the software remotely and re-installing them. Hopefully they will fix this, although the chap on the phone states that unless it becomes a priority then they more than likely won't find a fix for it. If that is the case then it may mean me switching to 12pay, something I keep meaning to do but can't seem to find the time.

__________________
Steve
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About