The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Invoice looking suspicious


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Invoice looking suspicious
Permalink Closed


Hi, I wonder if someone can help.

A client purchased an item of equipment they say cost £6000 saying it was paid for by cash and a personal loan from a relative so no money was paid from the business. They told me it was purchased on gumtree from a business that had ceased and could not get an invoice to which I said I could not accept this and couldn't put it through accounts and tax return. He then said he had contacted the guy and they were sending out an invoice which I received today.

i have googled name and address of the business listed on the invoice and can find no evidence that this business ever existed at that address. the unit number and address was advertised for letting so I called them and they said that this unit had not been used for the type of trade specified!

what do I do?

thanks for reading,

Em

 



__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2085
Date:
Permalink Closed

Surely if the piece of equipment exists and it is valued at around £6000 it's no different from someone bringing their own computer equipment into a business? I would just put it as capital introduced.

Kris

__________________

BKN Most Innovative Accountancy Firm 2012

Director and Co-Founder of The Bookkeepers Alliance

 



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1991
Date:
Permalink Closed

I would check to see if the equipment actually exists first?

__________________

Amanda



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 2021
Date:
Permalink Closed

I would make sure I have this in writing from the client, and then I would do what the client says, posting via capital introduced. Your accountant report, or letter that goes with the tax return, should state that you have prepared the accounts and tax return based on the explanations and information provided by the client. You could even mention that you have included the asset, but warn client that it might not stand up on an investigation. If the client gets an investigation, its on them to satisfy HMRC or suffer the consequence. If they complain to you, you show them the letter where you pointed out the risk. If they signed, its on them.

Ultimately though.. if you don't trust the client that much, why act for them at all?



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About