The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Draft FA 2016


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Draft FA 2016
Permalink Closed


For those unaware - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/finance-bill-2016-draft-legislation-overview-documents

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

cheers Johnny,

It was on my to do list but you motivated a quick reading.

quite a few interesting snippets in there.

I was particularly drawn to 1.13 : "The legislation will include provisions for transfer of debt"

basically thats saying that the legislation is to undermine the principle of separation of businness and personal and transfer company debts to the individuals behind the business for PSC's and Umbrella company workers.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

No problem. Mine ATM was the seemingly entire re-write of dividends. I imagine there will be a few more husband / wife transfers of PA elections this coming fiscal.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

abacus12345 wrote:

 I imagine there will be a few more husband / wife transfers of PA elections this coming fiscal.


 I find the whole option to be able to do this very discrimatory to those who do not have a husband or a wife!



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

I totally agree. I think it's a case of it being easier to police. I mean you can only have one wife / husband (legally lol) yet you could state anyone as being a gf / bf.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

But you can only 'give away' part of an allowance and it would be the same process whether its wifelet/hubby, children/grandkids, g/f and b/f, uncle Tom cobbley and all. Its nothing to do with policing of it, but because they know more people would probably do it and they would gain less in income.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

So if it were to be open to all, it wouldn't be abused?

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

There are supposedly stringent rules and laws in place to prevent breaches of NMW yet that goes on relatively unchecked. Yes HMRC will check some and supposedly make an example of them, but often do not even react/investigate cases when reported to them at the highest level. There is a whole industry where such practice of paying WELL below the NMW is absolutely rife, yet HMRC nor anyone else does ANYTHING about it! All rules and laws are abused in some form or another, usually by the minority rather than the majority.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

A certain amount of those being paid under the NMW will also be claiming benefits, illegally. Two wrongs don't make a right I know. As it stands, the PA shift of 10% can't be abused as it is only for married folk. If it were available to general partners, you'd possibly have some of those earning under the NMW, claiming benefits, whilst receiving kickback for transferring 10% of their PA! I do agree, the minority do in general ruin things for the majority.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Married + earache or not married and £220 a year worse off.  Hmmm tough choice biggrin



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've got loads of spare (ex) wives. Great new business idea. I could start hiring them out... Mmm, somehow I think even the potential tax savings would still not make them cost efficient investments.

__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:

Married + earache or not married and £220 a year worse off.  Hmmm tough choice biggrin

 

evileye



-- Edited by Cheshire on Saturday 5th of March 2016 07:22:10 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Banks no longer required to deduct interest- In Chapter 2 of Part 15 of ITA 2007 (deduction of income tax at source by deposit-takers and building societies) omit (a) section 851 (duty to deduct when making payment of interest on relevant investment), and (b) the italic heading preceding it.



-- Edited by abacus12345 on Monday 7th of March 2016 07:24:38 PM

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Tax on interest even - doh

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About