The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: VAT Registration - HMRC Fraud Checks


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
VAT Registration - HMRC Fraud Checks
Permalink Closed


Hi all, hope everyone's enjoying a sunny start to June!

Just wondering if anyone else has been contacted by HMRC in regards to recent VAT applications they've made?

We've applied for VAT for a one man Limited company in construction on a voluntary basis, and HMRC have come back with the below:

____

You may be aware from media publicity that there have been may false applications for VAT registration, designed to commit fraud. To protect the Exchequer and honest taxpayers, we have introduced more rigorous and extensive checks on businesses applying for VAT registration.

In order for me to progress with your VAT registration application could you please forward the following information.

 

  1. Copies of Contracts for both work undertaken and to be undertaken.
  2. Copy of Public Liability Insurance
  3. Business Bank Account Details and name of account.
  4. Copy of contracts for both permanent and contracted staff.
  5. Copies of any receipts/invoices 

_____

My main query was whether this is a common thing/one off, and also about point number 4. 

As our client is the sole employee of his own Limited company, does he legally need to have an employment contract for himself, or can we get away with telling HMRC nothing is in place?

 

Many thanks! Hope I've provided enough information. 



__________________
Jason.


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Jason

I did a VAT application last September on exactly the same type of client and no issue at all.  First time I've seen anything like what you've posted.  Only time I had a query was about 4 years ago when there was approx 2k refund on the first VAT return.  VAT office queried it and asked me to send 6 highest invoices to them, which they checked and accepted.  2, 3 and 4 don't even affect VAT so no idea why they need that info (bank account I can partly understand)



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Date:
Permalink Closed

Jason, the issue may be because the client is in the construction sector. This is one of those higher risk sectors that HMRC have been targeting. John's comments probably apply to other business sectors.
(No sunshine here in Cambs!)

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi John and leshoward,

We've applied for many VAT returns recently for similar clients with no issues at all. Seems like it's either a complete one off or we've just been lucky that this is the first.

Oh well! Will send what we have here and see what they come back with!

__________________
Jason.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1363
Date:
Permalink Closed

Infairness there are have a fair few VAT scams, running into the millions. Some are, dare I dare say it? Fascinating to read about. The system is very easy to manipulate. Aside from the obvious lose to the treasury, it must cost an absolute fortune in legal fees.

__________________

Johnny  - Owner of an overly-active keyboard. 

A man who can read, yet doesn't, is in no way wiser than a man who can't.

 

bk


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 171
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi, I had a similar one about 18 months ago. I think it was because the registration was for flat rate scheme and the query seemed to be regarding the rate of vat paid i.e. 9.5% or 14.5%, regarding whether they were supplying materials or labour only. They asked for the same information you have been asked for, but a quick chat on the phone between the vat office and my client soon solved the problem. Apparently they randomly do this sort of check. Must say it's the only one I've had.

__________________

Debbie Brown-Kane

Oakmanor Accountancy

www.oakmanoraccountancy.com

e: debbie@oakmanoraccountancy.com



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

I agree that its probably because he's in the construction industry. There is a thing at the moment that 'one man band' sub-contractors are setting up limited companies & registering for VAT then working for just one or two main contractors, often on a labour only basis whereas they should really be employees of the main contractor.


__________________

Julie



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

How do you determine whether someone should be on CIS or wages?  Most of the construction industry is CIS, which was set up to stop tax evasion.  In my opinion it works. Subby is stopped CIS at 20% which is usually enough to pay any tax liability at the end of the year, and more often than not, results in a refund.  Surely that is to the tax mans advantage?



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 29
Date:
Permalink Closed

bk wrote:

Hi, I had a similar one about 18 months ago. I think it was because the registration was for flat rate scheme and the query seemed to be regarding the rate of vat paid i.e. 9.5% or 14.5%, regarding whether they were supplying materials or labour only. They asked for the same information you have been asked for, but a quick chat on the phone between the vat office and my client soon solved the problem. Apparently they randomly do this sort of check. Must say it's the only one I've had.


 I've got a feeling this is the way it's likely to go. HMRC is looking to meet the client, but might push for a quick phone call as you mentioned.

Thanks everyone for their suggestions/help.



__________________
Jason.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 700
Date:
Permalink Closed

Ahhh...that explains it..

Beginning of May I registered a construction company for Vat and was asked to upload some information including a declaration from me on letter headed paper to state that I had done all the necessary MLR checks.

Still not had a Vat Registration certificate and heard nothing to date!

Georgie

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

I know of a business who were asked a raft of questions, covered an A4 page. Not one that I was involved in, their Accountant registered on their behalf but they showed me the letter. Not in construction either. Their Accountant had worked in HMRC some years before and told them that HMRC randomly do this.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 252
Date:
Permalink Closed

Leger wrote:

How do you determine whether someone should be on CIS or wages?  Most of the construction industry is CIS, which was set up to stop tax evasion.  In my opinion it works. Subby is stopped CIS at 20% which is usually enough to pay any tax liability at the end of the year, and more often than not, results in a refund.  Surely that is to the tax mans advantage?


The current position is that everyone should be on payroll unless they are genuinely self employed.  Every time I submit a CIS declaration I have to tick the box to say I have checked the employment status of all sub-contractors. This means that they fulfil a checklist including quoting for work so taking financial risk rather than being hourly paid regardless, providing own materials & equipment, having their own insurances and free to send someone else in their place (not an exhaustive list just off the top of my head)

HMRC want us all to be paying employer & employee National Insurance contributions wheras self employed subbies pay a different class of NI or if they have set up their own limited company often take a basic salary below the Lower Earning Level & the rest in dividends.

 



__________________

Julie

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About