The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Retainage / Holdback accounting for NON-Construction companies?


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Retainage / Holdback accounting for NON-Construction companies?
Permalink Closed


Hello everyone!

First post here after registering. Please forgive if I am asking something that is quite simple for seasoned accountants or bookkeepers.

I have set up a new company in the UK which deals with sales of online subscriptions. The payment processor we use will retain 10% of the gross sales for 6 months and then return the funds to us, they also charge us a 14.75% processing fee.  Admittedly I am only familiar with basic accounting but wanted to pick someone's brains on how to correctly set up my GL and correctly post an invoice.

If you would indulge me with an example:

Gross invoice£100.00 to account 4000
Processing fee-£14.75 to account 7905
Holdback-£10.00 to which account? 
Net amount paid to us:£75.25  

Then, in six months I would issue a new invoice where we will now have a returning holdback amount. Example on an invoice for £250 to keep numbers different:

Gross invoice£250.00 to account 4000
Processing fee-£36.88 to account 7905
Holdback-£25.00 to which account? 
Returning holdback£10.00  
Net amount paid to us:£198.12  

Please ignore VAT for now and take this as an exempt operation. Hope this question is not inappropriate or off topic for this forum and thank you in advance for any guidance you may be able to offer.

Richard



-- Edited by ricsut on Friday 10th of June 2016 03:07:51 PM

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Treat it as funds owed to you. Suggest you offer then collateral instead eg % cash deposit/ cash backed bond or some such, instead of taking funds from each invoice As that's just very messy. 

With the second invoice you need to process the payment excluding the holdback being returned.treat the holdback repayment separately.  Sorry hate that word holdback , should be retention monies.

I'm assuming you are using sage of some description, given the numbers you quote, but not everyone on here does so that won't mean anything yo them. 

I would suggest you get the advice you need on how to process this through your software direct from your Accountant. They should be able to provide some assistance on how to use the software, or at the very least the double entries required for each part of each transaction to enable you to key it, or get a bookkeeper who can ensure it's completed correctly from the start. 

We cannot answer further on this forum, nor provide advice I'm afraid.

 

 



-- Edited by Cheshire on Friday 10th of June 2016 10:20:05 PM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 66
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hello Richard

If I understand correctly you are using a card or online card payment processing merchant. My experience is .....

Payment made in full by the customer via the merchant who deducts their fees and the (I call it) a reserve amount. Usually 5 or 10% which is then released in the future (say 1 or 3 months). In my case the releases are made once per month.


I use Sage so this is the way I do it as I think it reflects what actually happens.

Set up a bank account for the merchant 12xx
Set up a nominal ledger account for the processing fees 79xx
Set up a balance sheet account 11xx for the reserves still owed to you

Using the newly set up bank account...
Post customers receipt in full (either to a Customer's account or as a bank receipt)
Post the fees deducted as a bank payment to 79xx
Post the 'reserve' amount as a Bank payment to 11xx
Post any released 'reserves' as a bank receipt to 11xx

When funds are transfered into your usual company current account post the bank transfer from the new bank account to the main bank.

Hopefully you can do this as a batch.
I print off and check all the transaction reports from the merchant on weekly basis as the merchant transfers weekly. Watching out for charge backs and failed transactions etc. And then post the weekly sales/receipts as above. There are hundreds of transactions per week.

If your transactions are fewer and are handled individually you may need to post them individually. Your choice as to what is best for you

Recording this way ensures your sales are recorded in full, you have a balance sheet account reflecting the balance of the 'reserves' being held and the processing fees are of course recorded separately from your normal bank charges.

Hope I've understood correctly and everything makes sense

HTH

__________________
Anne P


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 2
Date:
Permalink Closed

Dear Anne, 

thank you VERY much for your guidance. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you for taking the time to share your experience and to help a novice in bookkeeping. 

Wishing you the very best,

Richard

 



__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

ricsut wrote:

Dear Anne, 

thank you VERY much for your guidance. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thank you for taking the time to share your experience and to help a novice in bookkeeping. 

Wishing you the very best,

Richard

 


 Incredibly rude to thank one person, but not the other, who despite not obviously giving you the answer you thought you wanted, actually did, just not the sage references. Plus gave you some other advice. 

Despite it being highly inappropriate to ask your question on here in the first place as this site is not for business owners to get free advice.  Lucky you though got two responders giving advice for free, but yet you only thank one. 

edited for typo



-- Edited by Cheshire on Saturday 11th of June 2016 10:08:24 AM

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

And as if by magic after explaining to someone in another thread where a direct thankyou to one poster was appropriate an example of where a limited thankyou to a site member is not appropriate.

Richard, I'm glad that you have got the response that you felt appropriate from Anne and certainly thanking her about specifics of her answer is great where an answer amongst others really helps you. However, you cannot simply totally ignore the time and effort invested by Joanne in the response that she has given.

You may have been a victim here of the competence of your original question Richard as the question itself seemed to indicate that you have a fair understanding of what you are about so, in the absence of you having introduced yourself to the forum, Joanne answered it based on the assumption that you had a sound technical understanding.

Conversely Anne gave a comprehensive response making no assumptions about your knowledge base.

Both were really good well considered responses even though for you personally you may have found one more understandable than the other so naturally responded to that poster.

If in future you are hit with a similar scenario please by all means make special effort to thank one of the replies that you have receieved that gave you the exact answer that you needed, but do not simply ignore any others or you will quickly find that your questions posed on the site start to go unanswered.

Welcome to the forum. Would you now like to introduce yourself including an idea of your experience level and any bookkeeping or accountancy qualifications that you hold.

Shaun.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

 


 £8060. Although guess we will have to disagree. 



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cheshire wrote:

 


 £8060. Although guess we will have to disagree. 


Portia!

Lol.



__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1811
Date:
Permalink Closed

42, surely!

__________________

Vince M Hudd - Soft Rock Software

(I only came here looking for fellow apiarists...)



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

A few others too. Retainage!!!!! Not even a word. Bloody Americans trying to force their bad habits on to the originators of this beautiful language.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About