The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Direct earnings attachments


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Direct earnings attachments
Permalink Closed


One of my clients, despite instructions to check with me first, has paid his sole employee without taking into account a DEA.  Normally the employee is under the threshold, but this month he has paid her a backdated pay rise which takes her over.  We're only talking £15 deduction but how best to do it?  He's asked can we deduct it next month but my gut feeling is to issue the payslip with the deduction showing, and then for him to take it from the employee next month, otherwise it's going to mess up on Moneysoft isn't it?



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi John
Sorry I didnt mean to be ignoring this post, whilst answering ridiculous waste of time 'lets all go and sit in a bunch of daisies and de-stress'.

Anyway - back in the real world...

I would suggest you deduct form this month's pay/include on payslip and issue this with something in writing to the employee to say that she was overpaid by £xx amount in cash terms so that will be deducted from next month. I work on the basis that she might not be over that pay limit next month for some reason (sickness/doing a runner!) and at least your RTI stuff is correct. Get your client to send the funds to whoever has issued the DEA if they need paying monthly which I suspect. Plus do as Shaun suggested for de-stressing - shove the employers head under the water for a long time whilst reminding him he must not pay before RTI is done! lol

HTH

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

He has apologised, so I won't hold his head underwater this time biggrin  Yep, you've echo'd my thoughts so I'm happy to go with that.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About