The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: accounting error-disclosed by TB or not ?


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
accounting error-disclosed by TB or not ?
Permalink Closed


hi guys

Please , help me to understand this one. 

Error - ' recording a prompt payment discount allowed correctly in general ledger but not recording it in the subsidiary ledger'

 

Can this error be disclosed by TB or not ?

if it can be disclosed-why ?

if it can not be disclosed-why?

My thinking is that totals from general ledger should equal totals from subsidiary ledger. They are not equal here . Do we ignore subsidiary ledger when we prepair TB ?

 

 

 



__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1811
Date:
Permalink Closed

My immediate reaction to that error description is to assume that the 'general ledger' means the nominal ledger and the 'subsidiary ledger' means either the individual sales or purchase ledger accounts (depending on whether it's a sales discount given or purchase discount received).

If so, my reading suggests it's a case of one side of the transaction being recorded in the nominal ledger account for discounts given (or received), and the other side not being recorded in the relevant sales (or purchase) ledger account it relates to. (Double entry, remember!)

That would mean the trial balance would reveal that there's an error (but not what it is) because the debit totals wouldn't agree with the credit totals.

However, it may depend on what is meant by subsidiary ledgers - I've never studied, so I don't know what terminology is used in that context. :)

__________________

Vince M Hudd - Soft Rock Software

(I only came here looking for fellow apiarists...)



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
Permalink Closed

rafapak wrote:

hi guys

Please , help me to understand this one. 

Error - ' recording a prompt payment discount allowed correctly in general ledger but not recording it in the subsidiary ledger'

 

Can this error be disclosed by TB or not ?

if it can be disclosed-why ?

if it can not be disclosed-why?

My thinking is that totals from general ledger should equal totals from subsidiary ledger. They are not equal here . Do we ignore subsidiary ledger when we prepair TB ?

 

 

 


 thanks Vince for reply. When they say that this transaction has been correctly recorded in general ledger I immediately assume that both debit and credit sides in general ledger have been recorded correctly. Is this assumption correct ?

Dr Discount allowed

Dr Vat

Cr Receivables ( Sales ledger control account )

Is this how this transaction should have been recorded ? If yes, where did they make en error ?



-- Edited by rafapak on Monday 21st of November 2016 08:51:23 PM

__________________


Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1811
Date:
Permalink Closed

That's the point of my final sentence - my reading is that only one side has been correctly recorded, but it's possible they mean something different, along the lines of your interpretation.

i.e. I'm assuming that the credit in your example has been missed off.

__________________

Vince M Hudd - Soft Rock Software

(I only came here looking for fellow apiarists...)

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About