The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: printing Audit Trial-transactions only including bank reconciled


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
printing Audit Trial-transactions only including bank reconciled
Permalink Closed


Hi guys I am doing exercises on Sage and in one exercise I am suppposed to print Audit Trial for May ( detailed-transactions only including bank reconciled ). Do you know guys how to do it in Sage ? I haven't found so far any report that links Audit Trial with transactions reconciled. Please, help me in this matter.

-- Edited by rafapak on Friday 7th of April 2017 12:43:26 AM

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Rafal
You will find that the Audit trial automatically includes the Bank reconciled and indeed unreconciled items in it - you can see from the latter columns if items are Bank and indeed VAT reconciled.

By virtue of it being an audit then everything generally is included in the full detailed report, unless you tick the option to exclude the deleted items. My view - leave the deleted items in as it makes it easier to see what has happened with certain entries/allows further checks if eg Bank doesnt reconcile, although if you want a tidier cleaner report then I guess you would exclude them.

__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 1811
Date:
Permalink Closed

Beat me to it, Joanne - but because the audit trail reports would automatically include them, it leaves me wondering about the actual wording of the question: Why would it specifically state that they must be included?

__________________

Vince M Hudd - Soft Rock Software

(I only came here looking for fellow apiarists...)



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

VinceH wrote:

 it leaves me wondering about the actual wording of the question: Why would it specifically state that they must be included?


 TBH - my thoughts exactly.  Just checked my sage and there is no option to leave out the Bank rec stuff.  Bizarre.  



__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 99
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Rafapak - the only way I've found to do this is through the Sage Report Designer which can be a bit daunting to use but very useful once you get the hang of it, especially for things like wanting to print reports in date order rather than transaction number order.

If you go to Transactions and click the Reports button, go to Audit Trail and click once on the report called Audit Trail (Detailed), then click Edit at the top of the window. This opens up the Report Designer.
From here, click Report, then Criteria, and it brings up a small window which is essentially a summary of the criteria that comes up when you usually run reports (like date range, transaction number etc).
Click New Criteria, and then choose Audit Header > Bank Flag in the drop down boxes. Press OK three times to close all the windows now open, and then go to File>Save As and save it in the location that automatically comes up.

Now you can access this new report in Sage from Transactions > Reports > My Transaction Reports. You'll notice when you try to open it that the criteria window now has an extra line for "Bank Reconciled Flag" which you can change in the dropdown box to "Is" and then "R" in the one next to it.

Hope this helps :)




__________________
Faye


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
Permalink Closed

thanks guys for replies

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
Permalink Closed

fin6y wrote:

Hi Rafapak - the only way I've found to do this is through the Sage Report Designer which can be a bit daunting to use but very useful once you get the hang of it, especially for things like wanting to print reports in date order rather than transaction number order.

If you go to Transactions and click the Reports button, go to Audit Trail and click once on the report called Audit Trail (Detailed), then click Edit at the top of the window. This opens up the Report Designer.
From here, click Report, then Criteria, and it brings up a small window which is essentially a summary of the criteria that comes up when you usually run reports (like date range, transaction number etc).
Click New Criteria, and then choose Audit Header > Bank Flag in the drop down boxes. Press OK three times to close all the windows now open, and then go to File>Save As and save it in the location that automatically comes up.

Now you can access this new report in Sage from Transactions > Reports > My Transaction Reports. You'll notice when you try to open it that the criteria window now has an extra line for "Bank Reconciled Flag" which you can change in the dropdown box to "Is" and then "R" in the one next to it.

Hope this helps :)



It makes me wonder if doing so complicated procedures in Sage is required for computerised accounting exam on aat level 2 ? In some exercises they tell you to print reports and this printing involves only simple procedures whereas this one where they tell you to print audit trial with only reconciled transactions requires complicated procedures. Something is wrong here I think.

__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 8646
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hi Rafal
No you will NOT be required to do such in the exam so dont worry on that score.

I dont know if Faye knows your background and therefore the reasons for your questions, so has provided an answer which would be very helpful to someone in practice. Great for you to know in the longer term, albeit I know you are on a tme limit at the moment!


__________________

 Joanne 

Winner of Bookkeeper of the Year 2015, 2016 & 2017 

Thoughts are my own/not to be regarded as official advice,which should be sought from a suitably qualified Accountant.

You should check out answers with reference to the legal position



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
Permalink Closed

thanks for reply Joanne

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About