The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: bonuses-labour costs corrected with illustration


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
bonuses-labour costs corrected with illustration
Permalink Closed


I would like to say thank you to people who responded to my earlier thread. I am sorry I haven't presented full exercise content so that people had troubles to figure out what I meant . Now I attached illustration so that you guys can see full instructions for the exercise. Please, if you have some time have a look at the exercise . Maybe this time it will be easier for you to interpret what the author meant in this exercise. This exercise is called Tristan Ltd. I also included illustration with solution because although I have numbers I still don't get how they arrived at bonus payable numbers.  



-- Edited by rafapak on Sunday 16th of February 2020 04:56:52 PM



-- Edited by rafapak on Sunday 16th of February 2020 05:07:50 PM

Attachments
__________________


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Ah, so I was right biggrin

Expected units per hour is 24 so on Monday it would be 24 x 7.5 = 180

11 extra units were produced that day so it is 11/24 = 0.4533 x £4.25 = £1.947

 

Got to admit that reading the question it still wasn't clear until I saw the answer.



-- Edited by Leger on Sunday 16th of February 2020 05:50:25 PM

__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

And I stand corrected biggrin



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 396
Date:
Permalink Closed

thanks Ledger for showing how they arrived at bonus numbers

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 359
Date:
Permalink Closed

Careful in other such questions, as different wording/re-phrasing is meant to trip you up, so that you learn to dig deaper. As Joanne says, go back to your costing module and take care over the wording for direct and indirect labour. ALWAYS pop the question on, rather than your interpretation of it so we get full information. Glad you got it sorted.

__________________

Caron

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About