The Book-keepers Forum (BKF)

Post Info TOPIC: Ltd Co renting van to Director to use as self employed.


Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Ltd Co renting van to Director to use as self employed.
Permalink Closed


Director of Ltd Company will be doing some CIS work as a sole trader (he is registered as an individual) as work has dried up for the Company.  The Company is a CIS subcontractor.

Can the Company hire the van and tools to him in order to carry out this work, and in particular with the van, it's registered to the Company and has only been used on Company business up to press.  At present he claims 100% fuel costs so no VAT fuel surcharge, would this be affected.

I'm thinking maybe BIK but arguing with myself as it's not for the benefit of the employee but use by a bone fide self employed person, even though they are one and the same.



-- Edited by Leger on Monday 7th of February 2022 11:42:06 PM

__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Forum Moderator & Expert

Status: Offline
Posts: 11981
Date:
Permalink Closed

The thing that comes to my mind (and no doubt HMRCs) is if they can work as an individual why can they not work through their company?

I'm assuming here company VAT registered, individual not. Company reclaiming VAT, individual not charging it.

I'm the wrong person to be answering CIS questions but I'm looking more at the big picture and thinking seperation of convenience? Why can he find work as an individual but not a company unless its because he's 20% cheaper if thats the case then its take a stp back and take a look at the bigger picture of whether this is a case of a director robbing the company of income which undermines their fiduciary duty of care.

I'm probably overthinking this just from the short description of the scenario.

If the businesses did completely different things then that would be different but this sounds as if you have the same person, running two businesses, both doing the same thing.

Sorry, I'm thinking that I must be misreading it.

All the best matey,

Shaun.




__________________

Shaun

Responses are not meant as a substitute for professional advice. Answers are intended as outline only the advice of a qualified professional with access to all relevant information should be sought before acting on any response given.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

Shamus wrote:

The thing that comes to my mind (and no doubt HMRCs) is if they can work as an individual why can they not work through their company?


 Hi Shaun

Had this with a few of my clients, one where a Contractor refused to give my client any work as a Ltd Co but happily sub-contracted to him as a sole trader, I think the new IR35 rules scared him!

Also had a few builders where homeowners have point blankly refused to deal with them as Ltd Companies, I think this is down to all the bad press about cowboy builders and not being able to pursue a Company for not completing the agreed works, where as it is easier to go after a sole trader.

Hi John

I agree that it should be a BIK, the van still belongs to the Company and they are still an employee of the Company using the van for private use, you can pro rata it for the period of private use which would not work out to expensive and if they put there own fuel in there will be no fuel benefit, with the tools I would not even worry about it unless you are talking about significant plant & machinery.

As Shaun says if the Company is VAT registered you may need to look at the VAT disaggregation rules.

 



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thanks Doug, that's good news, agree with you on the tools.

Thanks for the heads up on disaggregation, that hadn't even crossed my mind.  He's going to have to decide whether to deregister (nowhere near VAT threshold) or register for VAT as a sole trader.

I've just looked at his vat returns last year and the vat input was a grand total of £600 vat, so I think it's going to make sense to deregister, as this may not be a one off.

Just a question on BIK, as I've had little involvement in them.  The benefit for the year is £3500.  Is this what he has to pay (pro-rata) or is it just the tax (20%) 

 

 

Thanks Shaun.

As Dougie said, it's in connection with IR35, and since his last contract finished has struggled to find any other work through the Ltd.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 1313
Date:
Permalink Closed

 

Hi John

The benefit of £3,500 (pro rata) will be reported on the employees P11D and he will pay income tax on this, the employer will have to pay Class 1A N/I of 13.8% on this amount and reported on the P11D(b)



__________________

Doug

These are only my opinions of how I see things and therefore should not be taken as advice



Master Book-keeper

Status: Offline
Posts: 3904
Date:
Permalink Closed

Thats great Doug, that will be a lot cheaper than renting it from the Company as he intended to.



__________________

John 

 

 

 Any advice given is for general guidance and professional advice should be sought applicable to your circumstances.

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
©2007-2024 The Book-keepers Forum (BKF). All Rights Reserved. The Book-keepers Forum (BKF) is a trading division of Bookcert Ltd. Registered in England Company Number 05782923. 2 Laurel House, 1 Station Rd, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, North Somerset, BS22 6AR, United Kingdom. The Book-keepers Forum and BKF are trademarks of Bookcert Ltd. This forum is a discussion forum only. There will usually be more than one opinion to any question and any posting should not be viewed as a definitive solution. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any posting on this site is accepted by the contributors or The Book-keepers Forum. In all cases, appropriate professional advice should be sought before making a decision. We reserve the right to remove any postings which are offensive, libellous, self-promoting or engaged in covert marketing. We will not notify users of removals. The views expressed in the forum posts are those of the individual and do not necessary reflect or agree with those of The Book-keepers Forum. Any offensive or unsuitable posts will be removed by the moderators. Any reader of this forum can request for a post to be looked into by sending an email to: bookcertltd@gmail.com.

Privacy & Cookie Policy  About